BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Kaplan CR Q1

Expert replies
by confuse mind » Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:29 pm
Since at least 1868, paleontologists have been arguing over whether or not birds evolved from dinosaurs. In the late 1960s, a scientist from Yale University named John Ostrom declared there were 22 features in the skeletons of meat-eating dinosaurs that were also seen in birds but not in any other animals. By the year 2000, 85 such characteristics unique to dinosaurs and birds had been discovered. Some very vocal critics continue to oppose the theory, but this skeletal evidence strongly supports the idea that dinosaurs are the direct ancestors of modern birds.

Which of the following, if true, would allow the conclusion of the argument to be more properly drawn?

A. It is impossible to tell for certain by examining the fossil record whether dinosaurs were warm-blooded like birds or cold-blooded like reptiles.
B. Therapod dinosaurs evolved feathers in place of scales because feathers conferred greater protection against the cold.
C. The existence of so many uniquely linked characteristics cannot be explained by convergent evolution, the development of similarities in separate lineages through the operation of similar selective factors on both lines.
D. Several of the supporters of the theory that birds evolved from dinosaurs are paleontologists who are highly regarded in their field.
E. The earliest "feathered dinosaur" fossil found has been dated at 129 million years old, while the earliest "true bird" fossil has been dated at 150 million years old.
[spoiler]
OA - C I marked - D
I agree that C is right after reading the explanation. What is the problem with D?
Since some scientists have given some results and explanations. Their integrity is necessarily n assumption which is states by D.[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by mohan514 » Sat Aug 25, 2012 9:37 am
when we have controversy between two options we should choose the one which makes a greater impact on the conclusion of the argument ..

so as here option c supports the conclusion ..we can can pick it up..

the conclusion in about evolution not about how trust worthy the paleantologists are..
[dont know its spelling, sorry]
Join the discussion

by ankit0411 » Wed Aug 29, 2012 4:14 am
confuse mind wrote:Since at least 1868, paleontologists have been arguing over whether or not birds evolved from dinosaurs. In the late 1960s, a scientist from Yale University named John Ostrom declared there were 22 features in the skeletons of meat-eating dinosaurs that were also seen in birds but not in any other animals. By the year 2000, 85 such characteristics unique to dinosaurs and birds had been discovered. Some very vocal critics continue to oppose the theory, but this skeletal evidence strongly supports the idea that dinosaurs are the direct ancestors of modern birds.

Which of the following, if true, would allow the conclusion of the argument to be more properly drawn?

A. It is impossible to tell for certain by examining the fossil record whether dinosaurs were warm-blooded like birds or cold-blooded like reptiles.
B. Therapod dinosaurs evolved feathers in place of scales because feathers conferred greater protection against the cold.
C. The existence of so many uniquely linked characteristics cannot be explained by convergent evolution, the development of similarities in separate lineages through the operation of similar selective factors on both lines.
D. Several of the supporters of the theory that birds evolved from dinosaurs are paleontologists who are highly regarded in their field.
E. The earliest "feathered dinosaur" fossil found has been dated at 129 million years old, while the earliest "true bird" fossil has been dated at 150 million years old.
[spoiler]
OA - C I marked - D
I agree that C is right after reading the explanation. What is the problem with D?
Since some scientists have given some results and explanations. Their integrity is necessarily n assumption which is states by D.[/spoiler]
By POE I arrived at C.
D is far off from the argument, and can be nearly considered as Out of scope.
Only C touches the argument and is the best.

Thanks,
Ankit
Don't predict future , create it !
Join the discussion

by 7777 » Wed Aug 29, 2012 10:47 pm
confuse mind wrote:Since at least 1868, paleontologists have been arguing over whether or not birds evolved from dinosaurs. In the late 1960s, a scientist from Yale University named John Ostrom declared there were 22 features in the skeletons of meat-eating dinosaurs that were also seen in birds but not in any other animals. By the year 2000, 85 such characteristics unique to dinosaurs and birds had been discovered. Some very vocal critics continue to oppose the theory, but this skeletal evidence strongly supports the idea that dinosaurs are the direct ancestors of modern birds.

Which of the following, if true, would allow the conclusion of the argument to be more properly drawn?

A. It is impossible to tell for certain by examining the fossil record whether dinosaurs were warm-blooded like birds or cold-blooded like reptiles.
B. Therapod dinosaurs evolved feathers in place of scales because feathers conferred greater protection against the cold.
C. The existence of so many uniquely linked characteristics cannot be explained by convergent evolution, the development of similarities in separate lineages through the operation of similar selective factors on both lines.
D. Several of the supporters of the theory that birds evolved from dinosaurs are paleontologists who are highly regarded in their field.
E. The earliest "feathered dinosaur" fossil found has been dated at 129 million years old, while the earliest "true bird" fossil has been dated at 150 million years old.
[spoiler]
OA - C I marked - D
I agree that C is right after reading the explanation. What is the problem with D?
Since some scientists have given some results and explanations. Their integrity is necessarily n assumption which is states by D.[/spoiler]
the third option is undoubtedly the supporter. but i dont think that d also supports the conclusion.
in the very first line,it's mentioned that since 18.. paleontologist have been arguing.
several (implies many,but still unwarranted to consider "most") of the supporters are highly regarded doesnt mean that several of the critics are not or can't be highly regarded.in this case it becomes a fight of highly regarded vs highly regarded(outcome cant be forseen).
Join the discussion