BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Kaplan CAT. Help

Expert replies
by bryan88 » Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:36 am
Statistics show that although consumption of low-calorie, alternative sweeteners has gone up in each of the past five years, so has the percentage of the population that is obese. According to sugar manufacturers, this shows that the low-calorie, alternative sweeteners are not effective weight loss aids.

Which of the following assertions, if true, would most weaken the sugar manufacturers' conclusion?

A)Many people who use low-calorie, alternative sweeteners eat some foods that are not low-calorie.
B)Some low-calorie, alternative sweeteners can increase the appetite, making a person eat more than he or she normally would.
C)Many people use low-calorie, alternative sweeteners to accompany a well-balanced, low-calorie diet.
D)Obesity has declined among people who have consistently used low-calorie, alternative sweeteners.
E)The rise in the consumption of low-calorie, alternative sweeteners is primarily due to an increase in the number of users rather than an increase in the amount each user consumes.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by GMAT Kolaveri » Fri Apr 20, 2012 9:26 am
OA : D
Regards and Thanks,
Vinoth@GMAT Kolaveri
https://www.facebook.com/GmatKolaveri
https://gmatkolaveri.tumblr.com/

Click the thank you button if you like my reply :)
Join the discussion

by bryan88 » Fri Apr 20, 2012 10:03 am
I know the OA.
Wanted a discussion as to why A is wrong
GMAT Kolaveri wrote:OA : D
Join the discussion

by GMAT Kolaveri » Fri Apr 20, 2012 6:47 pm
bryan88 wrote:I know the OA.
Wanted a discussion as to why A is wrong
GMAT Kolaveri wrote:OA : D
Its simple. Conclusion is low-calorie, alternative sweeteners are not effective weight loss aids.
To weaken this conclusion our OA should say that low-calorie, alternative sweeteners ARE effective weight loss aids.

A)Many people who use low-calorie, alternative sweeteners eat some foods that are not low-calorie. This option in a way strengthens the conclusion.
B)Some low-calorie, alternative sweeteners can increase the appetite, making a person eat more than he or she normally would. This strengthens the conclusion.
C)Many people use low-calorie, alternative sweeteners to accompany a well-balanced, low-calorie diet. This is not relevant.
D)Obesity has declined among people who have consistently used low-calorie, alternative sweeteners. This option weakens by saying that low-calorie, alternative sweeteners are effective.
E)The rise in the consumption of low-calorie, alternative sweeteners is primarily due to an increase in the number of users rather than an increase in the amount each user consumes.This is not related t o the conclusion.
[/b]
Regards and Thanks,
Vinoth@GMAT Kolaveri
https://www.facebook.com/GmatKolaveri
https://gmatkolaveri.tumblr.com/

Click the thank you button if you like my reply :)
Join the discussion

by ice_rush » Sun Apr 22, 2012 5:09 pm
The problem with choice A is the word "many". "Many" could mean 2 or 1000 or a million people..who knows. Besides, it is safe to assume that pretty much everyone eats some foods that are NOT low calorie. (A) does not affect the argument in anyway.

Hope this helps!
Join the discussion