Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

kaplan cat 6

Expert replies
by orel » Sun Nov 30, 2008 2:17 am
oa will be posted soon
thanks
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by agoyal2 » Sun Nov 30, 2008 3:07 am
IMO B.

1) X > Y

Taking x=10, y=7, xy=70
Taking x=2, y=1, xy=2

NOT SUFFICIENT

2) x^2 = y^2
=> x=y OR x=-y

So, xy = x^2 or -x^2
Since 70 is not a perfect square, answer is a definit NO

SUFFICIENT
Join the discussion

by jimmiejaz » Mon Dec 01, 2008 6:00 am
IMO ans is E.

Nothing is given about x or y
From 1 we have x>y
take any value.
x=10,y=8 xy=80 (no)
x=10, y=7 xy=70 (yes)
insuff. eliminate A,D

From 2 we have x^2=y^2
or x= +y
we still can have any value. x can be sqrt(70) too.
in that case xy will indeed be 70. in other cases it will not be.
remember, we cant take x=-y because the eqn will not hold true as a square cant be negative.
What if i have not yet beat the beast, I know i will beat it!!!!!!!!
Join the discussion

by srisl11 » Mon Dec 01, 2008 1:14 pm
IMO B

from st 2 , we get x= |y| or y = |x|

For any value of x (integer or fraction), xy = x|x| cannot be 70 since 70 is not a perfect square

Statement 1 : Here we need not know whether x>y or not (I know we shouldn't use " whether or not" but it just makes explanation easy
:) )

OA please
Join the discussion

by GMATters1001 » Mon Dec 01, 2008 2:34 pm
I'm going with C. The stem does not specify that x is an integer or fraction. (1) doesn't give us enough info. they could multiply to 70 or they could not (x=10, y=7 perhaps, perhaps not). (2) tells us that x and y would have to be the square root of 70, which is possible give than there are no constraints on x and y in the stem requiring that they are integers or fractions, but does not alone prove one way or the other. A, D and B are now eliminated, leaving C and E.

Taken together, we know that absolute value x must equal absolute value y AND that x is greater than y. So x=-y and vice versa since their squares equal eachother. So x and y have opposite signs and xy cannot be 70. SUFFICIENT.

Therefore C.
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Mon Dec 01, 2008 4:06 pm
OA please
and Official explanation if available
Join the discussion

by cramya » Mon Dec 01, 2008 4:39 pm
Stmt I

x>y

x=40 y=2
xy <> 70
TRUE

x=35 y = 2
xy=70



INSUFF

Stmt II

x^2 = y^2

x=+y or x=-y

x=2 y=2
xy <> 70

x=sqrt(70) y = sqrt(70)

xy = 70

INSUFF

Stmt I and II together

x>y

x^2 = y^2 (X=+Y OR X=-Y (or) Y=+X OR Y=-X)

Since x>y x has to be positive and y negative

xy cannot be 70

C) Agree with Gmaters.




Feruza,
Friendly request: If possible please post the OA using spoiler with the question.

Regards,
CR
Join the discussion

by cramya » Mon Dec 01, 2008 4:58 pm
Statement 2

x = -y
Sris,
x can be +y or -y. We dont know.
Hence insuff
Join the discussion

by srisl11 » Mon Dec 01, 2008 4:59 pm
cramya wrote:
Statement 2

x = -y
Sris,
x can be +y or -y. We dont know.
Hence insuff
Yeah , I typed the entire post and then realized it ..
It can be +ve too
IMO C
Join the discussion

by pbanavara » Mon Dec 01, 2008 6:51 pm
Love this question .. looks deceptively simple :)
Join the discussion

by orel » Mon Dec 01, 2008 10:40 pm
Hello, folks!

sorry for being late
here is the official explanation:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion

by cramya » Mon Dec 01, 2008 10:51 pm
Thanks! A very nice question. Like pbanavra said it looks deceptively simple but yet somewhat complicated.
Join the discussion

by abhishekbansal » Tue Dec 02, 2008 12:31 am
Hi

Can somebody explain me the explanation given ---

Since X > Y, therefore X = -Y

According to me, if we take the converse--

1.) X = Y or -Y
2.) X > Y

Taking X = -Y and substituting in 2.) we get, -Y > Y which cannot be true.

The same stands for X = Y and getting Y > Y which is again absurd

How did we arrive at the answer C ???? :roll:
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Tue Dec 02, 2008 12:43 am
abhishekbansal wrote:Hi

Can somebody explain me the explanation given ---

Since X > Y, therefore X = -Y

According to me, if we take the converse--

1.) X = Y or -Y
2.) X > Y

Taking X = -Y and substituting in 2.) we get, -Y > Y which cannot be true.

The same stands for X = Y and getting Y > Y which is again absurd

How did we arrive at the answer C ???? :roll:
-Y > Y is always true when Y is negative.

e.g. if y = -2, then it's true that -(-2) > -2.

You're 100% correct that Y > Y makes no sense, and that's exactly why the statements together are sufficient. Together, we know that x must be positive and y must be negative, and:

(+) * (-) = (-)

which means it's impossible for xy to equal 70. In other words, we get a definite "no" answer to the question, which means that (C) is the correct answer.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by jimmiejaz » Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Hi Stuart,

thanks for the explanation. But i still have a doubt.
From 2nd statement we have x= +y
yes, both x and y can be sqrt(70) too.
But, if we take x=-y don't we get -y^2 which cant be posiible as its a square.
I am confused in this.
What if i have not yet beat the beast, I know i will beat it!!!!!!!!
Join the discussion