BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Kaplan 800 wacky subjunctive

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:05 am
Location: Sydney
by sudipto » Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:56 pm
State legislators fear that traffic accidents would be more frequent and severe if the speed limit was increased to 75 mph on rural highways.

B. would be more frequent and severe were the speed limit to be increased up
C. would be more frequent and severe were the speed limit increased
D. wouldbecome more frequent and severe with the speed limit increased
E. would become more frequent and severe after the speed limit has increased

OA to be posted after discussion.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Legendary Member
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:56 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 104 times

by scoobydooby » Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:57 pm
IMO C
subjunctive: hypothetical situation, were should be used instead of was

A. uses was incorrectly.

B. uses were but too wordy. limit of ....to be increased upto..makes it reduandant by the use of limit and upto

C: uses were, does not have the wordiness of B. correct.

D: use of 'with' along with severe accidents alters the cause and effect relationship

E: has increased takes for granted that the speed limit has increased, but it is a hypothetical situation here
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:49 pm

by tallynik » Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:25 am
I choose C.
Same reasoning as scooby do.[/b]
Thanks For Your Help
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 55 times

Re: Kaplan 800 wacky subjunctive

by iamcste » Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:42 am
sudipto wrote:State legislators fear that traffic accidents would be more frequent and severe if the speed limit was increased to 75 mph on rural highways.

B. would be more frequent and severe were the speed limit to be increased up
C. would be more frequent and severe were the speed limit increased
D. wouldbecome more frequent and severe with the speed limit increased
E. would become more frequent and severe after the speed limit has increased

OA to be posted after discussion.
IMO C
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:05 am
Location: Sydney

by sudipto » Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:12 pm
OA is C
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 139
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 12:27 pm
Thanked: 8 times

by acecoolan » Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:27 pm
Try not to refer to the "question type" in your subject.

The "wacky subjunctive" was a dead give away :)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pmFollowed by: 25 members
Thanked: 237 times
GMAT Score:730

by logitech » Sat Nov 15, 2008 10:08 pm
acecoolan wrote:Try not to refer to the "question type" in your subject.

The "wacky subjunctive" was a dead give away :)
Seriously ;-) GMAC should start doing this too!
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1