BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Kaplan 2

Expert replies
by mals24 » Tue Nov 25, 2008 2:04 pm
Sorry guys for posting it as an image, i was feeling too lazy to type the whole thing out :P

Image

OA to follow after some quality discussions. Feel free to explain your choices
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Re: Kaplan 2

by iamcste » Tue Nov 25, 2008 2:19 pm
mals24 wrote:Sorry guys for posting it as an image, i was feeling too lazy to type the whole thing out :P

Image

OA to follow after some quality discussions. Feel free to explain your choices
B

All others are irrelavant to me
Join the discussion

by schumi_gmat » Tue Nov 25, 2008 2:24 pm
IMO B.

The key here is the comparison between country's X and country's Y foreign aid.

To weaken, we have to find a comparison which will weaken. Only B is giving this answer.
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Tue Nov 25, 2008 2:58 pm
i thought it was C

Y's arg is that their efforts to help 'other countries ' has 'grown'. well if the the most recent amount is a fraction of the original initial amount, then we cant gurantee that their efforts have grown.

B is compelling too, for the same reason that iamcste mentions. the other choices are BS.

EDIT - OOPS, i just saw that i mixed up X and Y. the answer HAS to be B.
Join the discussion

by logitech » Tue Nov 25, 2008 3:46 pm
X: 125
Y: 100

This is the usual trend.

Option C says that X spent 48 % much of what they spent before:

Xnew = 60

So now even tough it looks like Y spent more than X their contribution did not increase, which weakens the conclusion

Hence, C
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by Tryingmybest » Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:15 pm
Hi Logitech,
According to your explanation Ynew< 60%?? If so ,how ? Please explain
Join the discussion

by eracnos » Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:25 pm
It should be C.
Here's why.
Only C indicates that Country X spending on foreign aid had fallen hence Country Y's commitment to helping other countries has not grown.
Feeling blue is feeling true
Join the discussion

by Tryingmybest » Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:28 pm
IMO B
eracnos - what is the correlation between the spending of Country X and Y's commitment to help other Countries? It is not defined anywhere in the stem..Are they dependent?
Join the discussion

by eracnos » Tue Nov 25, 2008 5:36 pm
Just logically, the fact that Country Y spent more on foreign aid than Country X happened because Country X's spending slumped.
Example.
1945 1990
X 1000 100
y 125 125

Country Y's spending remains at the constant, while the country X's fell to 100. ====> Country Y's spending is not growing as it's leaders are arguing.
Though correlation between spending and commitment is not stated, in my opinion C is the most logical one.
PLZ post the OA!
Feeling blue is feeling true
Join the discussion

by Tryingmybest » Tue Nov 25, 2008 5:57 pm
eracnos -- Lets wait for the OA..

..I think your test is in this week..GOOD LUCK
Join the discussion

by logitech » Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:00 pm
Tryingmybest wrote:Hi Logitech,
According to your explanation Ynew< 60%?? If so ,how ? Please explain
Y did not change. The X dropped.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by mals24 » Wed Nov 26, 2008 2:19 am
OA C
Join the discussion

by nicolette » Fri May 13, 2016 1:29 am
I think C is the best in this case
Join the discussion