Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Kaplan 2

Expert replies
by mals24 » Tue Nov 25, 2008 2:04 pm
Sorry guys for posting it as an image, i was feeling too lazy to type the whole thing out :P

Image

OA to follow after some quality discussions. Feel free to explain your choices
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Re: Kaplan 2

by iamcste » Tue Nov 25, 2008 2:19 pm
mals24 wrote:Sorry guys for posting it as an image, i was feeling too lazy to type the whole thing out :P

Image

OA to follow after some quality discussions. Feel free to explain your choices
B

All others are irrelavant to me
Join the discussion

by schumi_gmat » Tue Nov 25, 2008 2:24 pm
IMO B.

The key here is the comparison between country's X and country's Y foreign aid.

To weaken, we have to find a comparison which will weaken. Only B is giving this answer.
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Tue Nov 25, 2008 2:58 pm
i thought it was C

Y's arg is that their efforts to help 'other countries ' has 'grown'. well if the the most recent amount is a fraction of the original initial amount, then we cant gurantee that their efforts have grown.

B is compelling too, for the same reason that iamcste mentions. the other choices are BS.

EDIT - OOPS, i just saw that i mixed up X and Y. the answer HAS to be B.
Join the discussion

by logitech » Tue Nov 25, 2008 3:46 pm
X: 125
Y: 100

This is the usual trend.

Option C says that X spent 48 % much of what they spent before:

Xnew = 60

So now even tough it looks like Y spent more than X their contribution did not increase, which weakens the conclusion

Hence, C
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by Tryingmybest » Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:15 pm
Hi Logitech,
According to your explanation Ynew< 60%?? If so ,how ? Please explain
Join the discussion

by eracnos » Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:25 pm
It should be C.
Here's why.
Only C indicates that Country X spending on foreign aid had fallen hence Country Y's commitment to helping other countries has not grown.
Feeling blue is feeling true
Join the discussion

by Tryingmybest » Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:28 pm
IMO B
eracnos - what is the correlation between the spending of Country X and Y's commitment to help other Countries? It is not defined anywhere in the stem..Are they dependent?
Join the discussion

by eracnos » Tue Nov 25, 2008 5:36 pm
Just logically, the fact that Country Y spent more on foreign aid than Country X happened because Country X's spending slumped.
Example.
1945 1990
X 1000 100
y 125 125

Country Y's spending remains at the constant, while the country X's fell to 100. ====> Country Y's spending is not growing as it's leaders are arguing.
Though correlation between spending and commitment is not stated, in my opinion C is the most logical one.
PLZ post the OA!
Feeling blue is feeling true
Join the discussion

by Tryingmybest » Tue Nov 25, 2008 5:57 pm
eracnos -- Lets wait for the OA..

..I think your test is in this week..GOOD LUCK
Join the discussion

by logitech » Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:00 pm
Tryingmybest wrote:Hi Logitech,
According to your explanation Ynew< 60%?? If so ,how ? Please explain
Y did not change. The X dropped.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by mals24 » Wed Nov 26, 2008 2:19 am
OA C
Join the discussion

by nicolette » Fri May 13, 2016 1:29 am
I think C is the best in this case
Join the discussion