BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Kap1 Q3- Number Prop

Expert replies
by yellowho » Sun Feb 20, 2011 5:45 am
I'm I doing something wrong here.

Since 9 is a factor of 2x, X has to be divisible by 9 and thus 3.

For A: 6x/54+2x/3 can be reduced to x/9+2x/3=> Since X/9 is an integer and 2x/3 is also an integer then this expression has to be an integer.

I put D initially because I did this same analysis for all of this and skipped D because it looked more complicated. Since D was the only choice left, I choose it but I know it is also wrong.

Exp. is suspicious. As you can see above, they broke out 3/6 from 2x/9. "Although, 2x/9 is an integer, it is multiplied by 1/2 so if 2x/9 is not even the expression will not be an integer". But is 2 times some number; it's always even.
Attachments
KC Q-13.JPG
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Night reader » Sun Feb 20, 2011 6:07 am
9 is a factor of 2x assumes 2 can not be divided by 9, so x/9
answer A does not seem correct, i.e. not integer because if you consider each value separately or combined it's still the same. choices A-E are integers according to me.
I think it's the software glitch, please consult with Kaplan experts at BTG.
yellowho wrote:I'm I doing something wrong here.

Since 9 is a factor of 2x, X has to be divisible by 9 and thus 3.

For A: 6x/54+2x/3 can be reduced to x/9+2x/3=> Since X/9 is an integer and 2x/3 is also an integer then this expression has to be an integer.

I put D initially because I did this same analysis for all of this and skipped D because it looked more complicated. Since D was the only choice left, I choose it but I know it is also wrong.

Exp. is suspicious. As you can see above, they broke out 3/6 from 2x/9. "Although, 2x/9 is an integer, it is multiplied by 1/2 so if 2x/9 is not even the expression will not be an integer". But is 2 times some number; it's always even.
Join the discussion

by KapTeacherEli » Mon Feb 28, 2011 12:26 pm
Hi yellowho,

It looks like x has to be divisible by 9, but only if we make a mistaken assumption: that x is an integer. In fact, x = 4.5 satisfies the question stem, since 2x = 9, which is (of course) divisible by 9.

You're right that (A) simplifies as you described; however, as soon as we plug x = 4.5 into x/9, we'll see that (A) can give us a non-integer value!

Hope this helps, and please feel free to PM me next time a problem like this pops up. Good luck prepping!
Eli Meyer
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
Cambridge, MA
www.kaptest.com/gmat

ImageImageImage
Join the discussion

by yellowho » Mon Feb 28, 2011 6:20 pm
Ok, I see what you are saying. The problem didn't restrict integer. If it doesn't have to be integer than all of the choices can or cant be an integer. If you want it to be an integer just solve for X on the numerator for Zero. You will get zero divided by some number. If you don't want it to be an integer thats very easy. This problem becomes silly if there's no integer restriction. (With no integer restriction, again all of the answer choices are right.) Also if you look at the intention of the problem, the explanation assumes integer restriction.
Join the discussion

by KapTeacherEli » Mon Feb 28, 2011 8:47 pm
Ah, but we do have a restriction: 2x is a multiple of 9. We can rephrase this: 2x is 9 times an integer, so x = 9 (n/2), where n must be an integer. This prevents us from picking off-the-wall values like x = 8.37 or something; our options for x are 0, 9/2, 9, 27/2, 18, 45/2, and so on. With these possible values, (A) does not always have to be an integer (plug 9/2 into x/9!), but in every other case we will always get an integer value, even with fractional values of x.
Eli Meyer
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
Cambridge, MA
www.kaptest.com/gmat

ImageImageImage
Join the discussion

by yellowho » Tue Mar 01, 2011 6:13 am
hmm. you are right. this is the first divisibility problem i've come across in which there's no integer restriction.
Join the discussion