BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Kap test-UPPERCLASSMEN

Expert replies
by bryan88 » Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:21 am
Between 1960 and 1966, the State University system had 92 percent of its capacity filled by students. During this time the system admitted 31 students each year for every 100 available spots in the system; the remaining 61 spots were filled by upperclassmen. From 1967 to 1975, the State University system filled 99 percent of its capacity with students; however the system also lowered its admission rate to 23 students for every 100 available spots each year.

If the statements above are true, which of the following conclusions can be most properly drawn?

A) As a university system's admission rate falls, it is generally true that the percent of capacity filled increases.
B) The number of available spots in the State University system declined between the two time periods.
C)The proportion of young people applying to college increased between the two time periods.
D)The number of people dropping out before finishing their degrees declined between the two periods.
E)The average length of time that a student stayed in the State University system increased between the two time periods.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by killer1387 » Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:12 am
IMO E

Rest are just baseless informations.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:49 am
It came down to the options A and B. I chose A and not B. Very close call between A and B.

B is wrong because it states that the empty places or blank spots declined. In short it is going from percentage to numbers. Lets say between 1960 to 1966 the overall capacity of the university was 100 students and the overall capacity of the university between 1967 to 1975, was 1000.
Then option B would be proved to be wrong...


Option A can be inferred based on the data given and not considering any other assumption or outside data...


Hope this is right and this explanation really helps... BTW wat is the OA???
IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE GMAT

LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!

Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.
Join the discussion

by mankey » Sat Mar 10, 2012 6:44 am
Request experts to kindly help on this one.

Regards.
Join the discussion

by mankey » Sat Mar 10, 2012 6:47 am
Request experts to kindly help on this one.

Regards.
Join the discussion

by techyrajeev » Sat Mar 10, 2012 9:57 am
IMO - E
Join the discussion

by Neo Anderson » Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:21 pm
If the statements above are true, which of the following conclusions can be most properly drawn?

A) As a university system's admission rate falls, it is generally true that the percent of capacity filled increases. We cant say what happens generally
B) The number of available spots in the State University system declined between the two time periods. Cant say because only the percentage is mentioned
C)The proportion of young people applying to college increased between the two time periods. Irrelevant
D)The number of people dropping out before finishing their degrees declined between the two periods. Probably yes, keep it for now!
E)The average length of time that a student stayed in the State University system increased between the two time periods. with increase in avg length of time of new entrants, the occupancy (capacity filled) will not be affected
IMO D
whats the OA??
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:39 pm
It came down to the options A and B. I chose A and not B. Very close call between A and B.

B is wrong because it states that the empty places or blank spots declined. In short it is going from percentage to numbers. Lets say between 1960 to 1966 the overall capacity of the university was 100 students and the overall capacity of the university between 1967 to 1975, was 1000.
Then option B would be proved to be wrong...


Option A can be inferred based on the data given and not considering any other assumption or outside data...


Hope this is right and this explanation really helps... BTW wat is the OA???



I am sorry for choosing option A. Option A is out of scope. I do not think that A really can be inferred as both admission by merits and admission to upperclassmen can be given at the same time.
There is nothing to do with the overall capacity...

Whatever the explanation is given for the option B is correct though...

But option A cannot be the OA and Option E can be inferred from what is given...

IMO E...
IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE GMAT

LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!

Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.
Join the discussion

by LalaB » Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:55 pm
A is wrong,since some general views are discussed.- As a university system's admission rate falls, it is generally true that the percent of capacity filled increases.

B.The number of available spots in the State University system declined between the two time periods
it is not necessarily true, since nothing is said about the decrease of spots filled by upperclassmen

c.The proportion of young people applying to college increased between the two time periods.
young ppl of colleges are out of scope

D.The number of people dropping out before finishing their degrees declined between the two periods.
again out of scope, since the number of ppl dropping out finishing the university doesnt really affect the number of ppl admitting to the university

E is correct. The average length of time that a student stayed in the State University system increased between the two time periods.
it means, that upperclassmen still study and because of them more spots for freshmen are not available
Happy are those who dream dreams and are ready to pay the price to make them come true.(c)

In order to succeed, your desire for success should be greater than your fear of failure.(c)
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Mar 11, 2012 5:18 am
bryan88 wrote:Between 1960 and 1966, the State University system had 92 percent of its capacity filled by students. During this time the system admitted 31 students each year for every 100 available spots in the system; the remaining 61 spots were filled by upperclassmen. From 1967 to 1975, the State University system filled 99 percent of its capacity with students; however the system also lowered its admission rate to 23 students for every 100 available spots each year.

If the statements above are true, which of the following conclusions can be most properly drawn?

A) As a university system's admission rate falls, it is generally true that the percent of capacity filled increases.
B) The number of available spots in the State University system declined between the two time periods.
C)The proportion of young people applying to college increased between the two time periods.
D)The number of people dropping out before finishing their degrees declined between the two periods.
E)The average length of time that a student stayed in the State University system increased between the two time periods.
The ADMISSION rate DECREASED (from 31/100 to 23/100).
The FILL rate INCREASED (from 92% to 99%).
How can the system ADMIT a lower percentage but FILL a higher percentage?
The UPPERCLASSMEN must be STICKING AROUND.

Answer choice E: The average length of time that a student stayed in the State University system increased between the two time periods.

The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by bryan88 » Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:02 pm
OA is E. I personally have never heard of upperclassmen
Join the discussion

by vishal.pathak » Sat Mar 24, 2012 10:19 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote:
bryan88 wrote:Between 1960 and 1966, the State University system had 92 percent of its capacity filled by students. During this time the system admitted 31 students each year for every 100 available spots in the system; the remaining 61 spots were filled by upperclassmen. From 1967 to 1975, the State University system filled 99 percent of its capacity with students; however the system also lowered its admission rate to 23 students for every 100 available spots each year.

If the statements above are true, which of the following conclusions can be most properly drawn?

A) As a university system's admission rate falls, it is generally true that the percent of capacity filled increases.
B) The number of available spots in the State University system declined between the two time periods.
C)The proportion of young people applying to college increased between the two time periods.
D)The number of people dropping out before finishing their degrees declined between the two periods.
E)The average length of time that a student stayed in the State University system increased between the two time periods.
The ADMISSION rate DECREASED (from 31/100 to 23/100).
The FILL rate INCREASED (from 92% to 99%).
How can the system ADMIT a lower percentage but FILL a higher percentage?
The UPPERCLASSMEN must be STICKING AROUND.

Answer choice E: The average length of time that a student stayed in the State University system increased between the two time periods.

The correct answer is E.
Hi Mitch,

E looks logical but B can also lead to 99% filling of seats and decrease of admission rate

Please share your thoughts about B

Regards,
Vishal
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Mar 25, 2012 2:47 am
vishal.pathak wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
bryan88 wrote:Between 1960 and 1966, the State University system had 92 percent of its capacity filled by students. During this time the system admitted 31 students each year for every 100 available spots in the system; the remaining 61 spots were filled by upperclassmen. From 1967 to 1975, the State University system filled 99 percent of its capacity with students; however the system also lowered its admission rate to 23 students for every 100 available spots each year.

If the statements above are true, which of the following conclusions can be most properly drawn?

A) As a university system's admission rate falls, it is generally true that the percent of capacity filled increases.
B) The number of available spots in the State University system declined between the two time periods.
C)The proportion of young people applying to college increased between the two time periods.
D)The number of people dropping out before finishing their degrees declined between the two periods.
E)The average length of time that a student stayed in the State University system increased between the two time periods.
The ADMISSION rate DECREASED (from 31/100 to 23/100).
The FILL rate INCREASED (from 92% to 99%).
How can the system ADMIT a lower percentage but FILL a higher percentage?
The UPPERCLASSMEN must be STICKING AROUND.

Answer choice E: The average length of time that a student stayed in the State University system increased between the two time periods.

The correct answer is E.
Hi Mitch,

E looks logical but B can also lead to 99% filling of seats and decrease of admission rate

Please share your thoughts about B

Regards,
Vishal
Always note when an answer choice changes the scope.
The passage is about PERCENTAGES.
Answer choice B is about an actual NUMBER.
A decline in the PERCENTAGE of available spots does not mean that the actual NUMBER of available spots declined.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by vishal.pathak » Sun Mar 25, 2012 4:23 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote: Always note when an answer choice changes the scope.
The passage is about PERCENTAGES.
Answer choice B is about an actual NUMBER.
A decline in the PERCENTAGE of available spots does not mean that the actual NUMBER of available spots declined.
Hi Mitch,

Thanks for your help. Please help me understand the following.

What are the question types in which scope is important. I believe there are following 10 types of question types

1. Must be true/Most supported
2. Main point
3. Strengthen
4. Weaken
5. Resolve the paradox
6. Method of reasoning
7. Flaw in reasoning
8. Parallel reasoning
9. Evaluate the argument
10. Assumption

I believe scope is important in all question types apart from strengthen and weaken question. Please correct me if I am wrong

Thanks a lot for your help

Regards,
Vishal
Join the discussion

by venkart89 » Tue Mar 27, 2012 9:40 pm
Option E
800 is my lucky number.

https://cat4iimgmat4isb.blogspot.in
Join the discussion