Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Kap 800 Question

Expert replies
by chaitanya.mehrotra » Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:58 pm
Kopke: In the past ten years, most of the new clothes that I have purchased have fallen apart within a few short years. However, all of the clothes that I have purchased at vintage clothing shops are still in excellent condition, despite the fact that they were all over thirty years old at the time that I bought them. Clearly, clothes are not manufactured as well today as they were when those vintage clothes were made.

Which of the following is a weakness in the argument above?
A. It fails to demonstrate that the clothes manufactured thirty years ago were of higher quality than clothes of all other era.
B. It neglects the possibility that the clothes of thirty years ago, when prices are adjusted for inflation, cost more than clothes manufactured today.
C. It confuses the number of clothing items sold with the proportion of those items that are no longer useful.
D. It does not explain why clothing manufacturing standards have fallen over item.
E. It fails to take into account clothes made over thirty years ago that are no longer fit for sale.

OA after some discussion. Took me 3 min to crack , let me know ur timing .
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by diebeatsthegmat » Sun Jul 31, 2011 1:16 am
i think this Cr is kinda simple... lets think. you bought a dress or a shirt but you dislike the way it is because its not fashionable so you reject to wear it and stored it into wardrobe... and after years its still the same, new and good...
so compared to other shirt or dress, its still good not because its quality is good, its good just because its never used... so after years its still good as new.
hope it helps
Join the discussion

by gmatblood » Sun Jul 31, 2011 9:44 am
IMO:B 2:15
Join the discussion

by need720+ » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:41 am
IMO E

Please post OA.
Join the discussion

by sophiesaurabh » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:44 am
Answer is E.

E talks about the clothes that were made 30 years back but are now NOT fit for use have not been considered for the argument. The only clothes that the argument talks about are the ones that have survived 30 years and are still fit. This may be just 1 cloth out of thousands, we don't know.
Join the discussion

by need720+ » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:58 am
sophiesaurabh wrote:Answer is E.

E talks about the clothes that were made 30 years back but are now NOT fit for use have not been considered for the argument. The only clothes that the argument talks about are the ones that have survived 30 years and are still fit. This may be just 1 cloth out of thousands, we don't know.
OG12 CR Q114 is very similar to this problem. Based on same principle.
Join the discussion

by dinaroneo » Sun Jul 31, 2011 4:53 pm
clearly E; although it took me 2:35 to crack
Join the discussion

by ColumbiaVC » Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:13 pm
Join the discussion

by sunnyjohn » Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:53 pm
IMO: E, 1:40 seconds.
Join the discussion

by ratan_2009 » Tue Aug 02, 2011 1:07 pm
IMO C, 2.1 min
Join the discussion

by BlindVision » Thu Aug 04, 2011 4:57 pm
chaitanya.mehrotra wrote:Kopke: In the past ten years, most of the new clothes that I have purchased have fallen apart within a few short years. However, all of the clothes that I have purchased at vintage clothing shops are still in excellent condition, despite the fact that they were all over thirty years old at the time that I bought them. Clearly, clothes are not manufactured as well today as they were when those vintage clothes were made.

Which of the following is a weakness in the argument above?
A. It fails to demonstrate that the clothes manufactured thirty years ago were of higher quality than clothes of all other era.
B. It neglects the possibility that the clothes of thirty years ago, when prices are adjusted for inflation, cost more than clothes manufactured today.
C. It confuses the number of clothing items sold with the proportion of those items that are no longer useful.
D. It does not explain why clothing manufacturing standards have fallen over item.
E. It fails to take into account clothes made over thirty years ago that are no longer fit for sale.

OA after some discussion. Took me 3 min to crack , let me know ur timing .
B 1:55
Life is a Test
Join the discussion