BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Kap 800 Question

Expert replies
by chaitanya.mehrotra » Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:58 pm
Kopke: In the past ten years, most of the new clothes that I have purchased have fallen apart within a few short years. However, all of the clothes that I have purchased at vintage clothing shops are still in excellent condition, despite the fact that they were all over thirty years old at the time that I bought them. Clearly, clothes are not manufactured as well today as they were when those vintage clothes were made.

Which of the following is a weakness in the argument above?
A. It fails to demonstrate that the clothes manufactured thirty years ago were of higher quality than clothes of all other era.
B. It neglects the possibility that the clothes of thirty years ago, when prices are adjusted for inflation, cost more than clothes manufactured today.
C. It confuses the number of clothing items sold with the proportion of those items that are no longer useful.
D. It does not explain why clothing manufacturing standards have fallen over item.
E. It fails to take into account clothes made over thirty years ago that are no longer fit for sale.

OA after some discussion. Took me 3 min to crack , let me know ur timing .
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by diebeatsthegmat » Sun Jul 31, 2011 1:16 am
i think this Cr is kinda simple... lets think. you bought a dress or a shirt but you dislike the way it is because its not fashionable so you reject to wear it and stored it into wardrobe... and after years its still the same, new and good...
so compared to other shirt or dress, its still good not because its quality is good, its good just because its never used... so after years its still good as new.
hope it helps
Join the discussion

by gmatblood » Sun Jul 31, 2011 9:44 am
IMO:B 2:15
Join the discussion

by need720+ » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:41 am
IMO E

Please post OA.
Join the discussion

by sophiesaurabh » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:44 am
Answer is E.

E talks about the clothes that were made 30 years back but are now NOT fit for use have not been considered for the argument. The only clothes that the argument talks about are the ones that have survived 30 years and are still fit. This may be just 1 cloth out of thousands, we don't know.
Join the discussion

by need720+ » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:58 am
sophiesaurabh wrote:Answer is E.

E talks about the clothes that were made 30 years back but are now NOT fit for use have not been considered for the argument. The only clothes that the argument talks about are the ones that have survived 30 years and are still fit. This may be just 1 cloth out of thousands, we don't know.
OG12 CR Q114 is very similar to this problem. Based on same principle.
Join the discussion

by dinaroneo » Sun Jul 31, 2011 4:53 pm
clearly E; although it took me 2:35 to crack
Join the discussion

by ColumbiaVC » Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:13 pm
Join the discussion

by sunnyjohn » Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:53 pm
IMO: E, 1:40 seconds.
Join the discussion

by ratan_2009 » Tue Aug 02, 2011 1:07 pm
IMO C, 2.1 min
Join the discussion

by BlindVision » Thu Aug 04, 2011 4:57 pm
chaitanya.mehrotra wrote:Kopke: In the past ten years, most of the new clothes that I have purchased have fallen apart within a few short years. However, all of the clothes that I have purchased at vintage clothing shops are still in excellent condition, despite the fact that they were all over thirty years old at the time that I bought them. Clearly, clothes are not manufactured as well today as they were when those vintage clothes were made.

Which of the following is a weakness in the argument above?
A. It fails to demonstrate that the clothes manufactured thirty years ago were of higher quality than clothes of all other era.
B. It neglects the possibility that the clothes of thirty years ago, when prices are adjusted for inflation, cost more than clothes manufactured today.
C. It confuses the number of clothing items sold with the proportion of those items that are no longer useful.
D. It does not explain why clothing manufacturing standards have fallen over item.
E. It fails to take into account clothes made over thirty years ago that are no longer fit for sale.

OA after some discussion. Took me 3 min to crack , let me know ur timing .
B 1:55
Life is a Test
Join the discussion