BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Jury

Expert replies
by aks.anupam » Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:18 am
People who have specialized knowledge about a scientific or technical issue are systematically excluded from the trials where the issue is relevant. Thus, trial by jury is not a fair means of settling disputes involving such issues.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A) The more complicated the issue being litigated, the less likely it is that a juror without specialized knowledge of the field involved will be able to comprehend the testimony being given.

B) The more a juror knows about a particular scientific or technical issue involved in a trial, the more likely it is that the juror will be prejudiced in favor of one of the litigating parties before the trial begins.

C) Appointing an impartial arbitrator is not a fair means of settling disputes involving scientific or technical issues, because arbitrators tend to favor settlements in which both parties compromise on the issue.

D) Experts who give testimony on scientific or technical issues tend to hedge their conclusions by discussing the possibility of errors.

E) Expert witnesses in specialized fields often command fees that are so high that many people involved in litigation cannot afford their services.

OA to follow.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by sreak1089 » Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:29 am
IMO answer is C
Join the discussion

by aks.anupam » Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:32 am
C is incorrect.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:35 am
Join the discussion

by aks.anupam » Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:49 am
Even I marked the answer as A, but later found that that it was incorrect.
Join the discussion

by sanp_l » Wed Sep 23, 2009 10:05 am
I would go for Option B.
It makes a strong point against jurors with specific knowledge.

Whats the OA?
Sandy
Join the discussion

by aks.anupam » Wed Sep 23, 2009 10:29 am
OA is B. Could you please explain the answer. I am not able to figure out why B is the answer.
Join the discussion

by sanp_l » Wed Sep 23, 2009 10:38 am
As per the text, people with specific knowledge are not present during trials.
Thus the trial by jury is not fair.

Anything which can show that specific knowledge holders' presence doesnt aid in a fair trial
will duly weaken the argument.

Option A: A juror without special knowledge will be less likely to comprehend the testimony.
hence not A. It clearly says that specific knowledge is important to comprehend. It strengthens the argument.

Option B: It says that specific knowledge won't be helpful and would instead result in a biased trial. It clearly serves to weaken the argument
implying that people with specific knowledge arent needed. Thus it weakens the argument.

Option C: Impartial arbitrator has nothing to speak about people with specific knowledge and their inclusion in the jury of the trial.

Option D and Option E are clearly out.

Hence the answer Option B.

Hope it helps.
Sandy
Join the discussion

by aks.anupam » Thu Sep 24, 2009 5:26 pm
Thanks!
Join the discussion

by sanp_l » Thu Sep 24, 2009 8:55 pm
@aks.anupam: can you hit the thanks button. :D
Sandy
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Fri Sep 25, 2009 5:46 am
sanp_l wrote:@aks.anupam: can you hit the thanks button. :D

Hahahaha..Now it reminds me of the importance of buzzing the thanks button!!!

Recently sometiime back I asked Sandy to Buzz the thanks button & now that chain is extending...

anupam..do press that button..He deserves that!!
Join the discussion