BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Julie bought 2 adult tickets, 1 child ticket

Expert replies
by melguy » Thu Sep 05, 2013 3:59 am
Julie bought 2 adult tickets, 1 child ticket, and 1 senior ticket to an amusement park. She received 30% off the adult tickets and 15% off the child and senior tickets. Was the total amount of the 4 discounts greater than 20% of the sum of the regular prices of the 4 tickets?

1. The original price of an adult ticket was $48, the original price of the senior ticket was $24, and the original price of the child ticket was less than the senior ticket.

2. The original price of the child ticket was $12.

I have got the answer to this question but as I was reading the explanation as to what approach has been explained I noticed a small confusion in a concept

Statement 1

30% off adult tickets and 15% off senior and child ticket

The explanation gives an equation
0.30(2)(48) + 0.15(24) + 0.15(c) > 0.20(2(48) + 24 + c)

I am confused with a small thing here. If we say 30% discount then we should multiply by .70 instead of .30? Same with the other one - we should multiply by .85 instead of .15.

For example - 30% discount on $100 is $70 (100*.70) not $30. What am I missing? Please help. Thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by vinay1983 » Thu Sep 05, 2013 4:16 am
Hmm it's something like this:

If we say "20% discount on $ 50, then we mean (20/100) * 50 = $10, so new price will be 50-10= 40.This can be arrived at, instead by "considering that 20% discount on $ 50 is effectively 80 % of the price i.e (80/100) * 50 = 40

Thus in your case "If we say 30% discount then we should multiply by .70(to get the answer directly) instead of .30(to first find the discounted amount, then deducting this from the original price, cumbersome!)


30% discount on $100 is $70 (100*.70) not $30. What am I missing?

You are considering the discount rate of 30%, then you calculate it in your head that 30% off 100 is effectively 70% of 100 (this is what you are arriving at, then you say 0.70*100=70, which is 100-30(100*0.30).

Hope I am clear :D :)
You can, for example never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to!
Join the discussion

by ganeshrkamath » Thu Sep 05, 2013 7:35 pm
melguy wrote:Julie bought 2 adult tickets, 1 child ticket, and 1 senior ticket to an amusement park. She received 30% off the adult tickets and 15% off the child and senior tickets. Was the total amount of the 4 discounts greater than 20% of the sum of the regular prices of the 4 tickets?

1. The original price of an adult ticket was $48, the original price of the senior ticket was $24, and the original price of the child ticket was less than the senior ticket.

2. The original price of the child ticket was $12.

I have got the answer to this question but as I was reading the explanation as to what approach has been explained I noticed a small confusion in a concept

Statement 1

30% off adult tickets and 15% off senior and child ticket

The explanation gives an equation
0.30(2)(48) + 0.15(24) + 0.15(c) > 0.20(2(48) + 24 + c)

I am confused with a small thing here. If we say 30% discount then we should multiply by .70 instead of .30? Same with the other one - we should multiply by .85 instead of .15.

For example - 30% discount on $100 is $70 (100*.70) not $30. What am I missing? Please help. Thanks
Question:
0.3*2A + 0.15*(C+S) > 0.2*(2A+C+S) ?
0.6A + 0.15C + 0.15S > 0.4A + 0.2C + 0.2S ?
0.2A > 0.05(C+S) ?
4A > (C+S) ?

Statement 1: A = 48, S = 24, C < S
C + S < 24 + 24
C + S < 48
Sufficient.

Statement 2:
C = 12
Not sufficient.

Choose A

The explanation compares the discounts in the two cases, not the price.

Cheers
Every job is a self-portrait of the person who did it. Autograph your work with excellence.

Kelley School of Business (Class of 2016)
GMAT Score: 750 V40 Q51 AWA 5 IR 8
https://www.beatthegmat.com/first-attemp ... tml#688494
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Sep 08, 2013 8:59 am
Julie bought 2 adult tickets, 1 child ticket, and 1 senior ticket to an amusement park. She received 30% off the adult tickets and 15% off the child and senior tickets. Was the total amount of the 4 discounts greater than 20% of the sum of the regular prices of the 4 tickets?

1. The original price of an adult ticket was $48, the original price of the senior ticket was $24, and the original price of the child ticket was less than the senior ticket.

2. The original price of the child ticket was $12.
Statement 1: The original price of an adult ticket was $48, the original price of the senior ticket was $24, and the original price of the child ticket was less than the senior ticket.
Try EXTREMES.

Case 1: Plug in the THRESHOLD price for the original price of the child ticket.
Since the original price of the child ticket must be less than the original price of the senior ticket, the threshold price for the child ticket = 24.
In this case:
(sum of the discounts)/(sum of the original prices) = (.3*2*48 + .15*24 + .15*24)/(2*48 + 24 + 24) = (28.8 + 3.6 + 3.6)/144 = 36/144 = 25%.

Case 2: Plug in a very small value for the original price of the child ticket.
Let the original price of a child ticket = 1 cent.
Here, the original price and the discounted price of the child ticket will both be so small that they can be disregarded in our calculations.
In this case:
(sum of the other discounts)/(sum of the other original prices) = (.3*2*48 + .15*24)/(2*48 + 24) = (28.8 + 3.6)/120 ≈ 32/120 = 26.66%.

Since the discount is greater than 20% in each case, SUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: The original price of the child ticket was $12.
No way to determine whether the sum of the discounts was greater than 20%.
INSUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion