BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Judges and Sexual Discrimination

Expert replies
by ronnie1985 » Sun May 20, 2012 10:40 am
Some people have questioned the judge's objectivity in cases of GMAT discrimination against
women. But the record shows that in sixty percent of such cases, the judge has decided in
favor of the women. This record demonstrates that the judge has not discriminated against
women in cases of GMAT discrimination against women.
The argument above is flawed in that it ignores the possibility that
A. a large number of the judge's cases arose out of allegations of GMAT discrimination against
women
B. many judges find it difficult to be objective in cases of GMAT discrimination against women
C. the judge is biased against women defendants or plaintiffs in cases that do not involve
GMAT discrimination
D. the majority of the cases of GMAT discrimination against women that have reached the
judge's court have been appealed from a lower court
E. the evidence shows that the women should have won in more than sixty percent of the
judge's cases involving GMAT discrimination against women

OA after some discussion...
Follow your passion, Success as perceived by others shall follow you
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by GmatKiss » Sun May 20, 2012 11:30 am
Good one! Between B and E

IMO: E
Join the discussion

by ronnie1985 » Mon May 21, 2012 6:38 am
(E) is right

Expert please explain why (B) is wrong???
Follow your passion, Success as perceived by others shall follow you
Join the discussion

by Gaurav 2013-fall » Sat Jun 02, 2012 4:22 am
IMO E

We have to prove that judges have discriminated against women in GMAT discrimination cases.

B says it is difficult for judges to be fair(objectivity=fairness) but doesn't say that the judges have actually been unfair. Hope this helps!
Join the discussion

by nitingoel » Sat Jun 02, 2012 5:23 am
Yes, E it is.

The passage starts with the quote as "Some people have questioned the objectivity", and later part of the passage tries to show that the judges has not discriminated. but option B just states that judges find it difficult to be objective which no where correlated to the 2 arguments discussed in the passage. Hence it could not be B.

Regards
Nitin
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Jun 02, 2012 1:00 pm
ronnie1985 wrote:Some people have questioned the judge's objectivity in cases of GMAT discrimination against
women. But the record shows that in sixty percent of such cases, the judge has decided in
favor of the women. This record demonstrates that the judge has not discriminated against
women in cases of GMAT discrimination against women.
The argument above is flawed in that it ignores the possibility that
A. a large number of the judge's cases arose out of allegations of GMAT discrimination against
women
B. many judges find it difficult to be objective in cases of GMAT discrimination against women
C. the judge is biased against women defendants or plaintiffs in cases that do not involve
GMAT discrimination
D. the majority of the cases of GMAT discrimination against women that have reached the
judge's court have been appealed from a lower court
E. the evidence shows that the women should have won in more than sixty percent of the
judge's cases involving GMAT discrimination against women

OA after some discussion...
Premise: The judge decided in favor of the women in 60% of GMAT discrimination cases
Conclusion: The judge has not discriminated against women in GMAT discrimination cases.

B) Many judges find it difficult to be objective in cases of GMAT discrimination against women
Does this mean that the judge in the passage is not objective? No - many judge does not equal all judges.
Also, even if the judge in the passage does find it difficult to be objective in cases of GMAT discrimination, we can't conclude that the judge wasn't objective. Difficult does not equal impossible.

E is the best answer because it says that more than 60% of those women should have won their cases.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by ramprakaashk » Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:36 pm
IMO : D . it says many cases are appealed from lower courts. It provides an alternate reason that we the people were not agreeing with the verdict of lower courts and then appealed to the higher courts. This gives us a room to infer that the judges in the lower court might have shown discrimination against women.
Join the discussion