BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Judges and Sexual Discrimination

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 626
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 2:50 amFollowed by: 10 members
Location: Ahmedabad
Thanked: 31 times
by ronnie1985 » Sun May 20, 2012 10:40 am
Some people have questioned the judge's objectivity in cases of GMAT discrimination against
women. But the record shows that in sixty percent of such cases, the judge has decided in
favor of the women. This record demonstrates that the judge has not discriminated against
women in cases of GMAT discrimination against women.
The argument above is flawed in that it ignores the possibility that
A. a large number of the judge's cases arose out of allegations of GMAT discrimination against
women
B. many judges find it difficult to be objective in cases of GMAT discrimination against women
C. the judge is biased against women defendants or plaintiffs in cases that do not involve
GMAT discrimination
D. the majority of the cases of GMAT discrimination against women that have reached the
judge's court have been appealed from a lower court
E. the evidence shows that the women should have won in more than sixty percent of the
judge's cases involving GMAT discrimination against women

OA after some discussion...
Follow your passion, Success as perceived by others shall follow you
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 amFollowed by: 43 members
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
GMAT Score:640

by GmatKiss » Sun May 20, 2012 11:30 am
Good one! Between B and E

IMO: E
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 626
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 2:50 amFollowed by: 10 members
Location: Ahmedabad
Thanked: 31 times

by ronnie1985 » Mon May 21, 2012 6:38 am
(E) is right

Expert please explain why (B) is wrong???
Follow your passion, Success as perceived by others shall follow you
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 307
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:45 pm
Thanked: 12 times
GMAT Score:700

by Gaurav 2013-fall » Sat Jun 02, 2012 4:22 am
IMO E

We have to prove that judges have discriminated against women in GMAT discrimination cases.

B says it is difficult for judges to be fair(objectivity=fairness) but doesn't say that the judges have actually been unfair. Hope this helps!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:18 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by nitingoel » Sat Jun 02, 2012 5:23 am
Yes, E it is.

The passage starts with the quote as "Some people have questioned the objectivity", and later part of the passage tries to show that the judges has not discriminated. but option B just states that judges find it difficult to be objective which no where correlated to the 2 arguments discussed in the passage. Hence it could not be B.

Regards
Nitin
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pmFollowed by: 1268 members
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Jun 02, 2012 1:00 pm
ronnie1985 wrote:Some people have questioned the judge's objectivity in cases of GMAT discrimination against
women. But the record shows that in sixty percent of such cases, the judge has decided in
favor of the women. This record demonstrates that the judge has not discriminated against
women in cases of GMAT discrimination against women.
The argument above is flawed in that it ignores the possibility that
A. a large number of the judge's cases arose out of allegations of GMAT discrimination against
women
B. many judges find it difficult to be objective in cases of GMAT discrimination against women
C. the judge is biased against women defendants or plaintiffs in cases that do not involve
GMAT discrimination
D. the majority of the cases of GMAT discrimination against women that have reached the
judge's court have been appealed from a lower court
E. the evidence shows that the women should have won in more than sixty percent of the
judge's cases involving GMAT discrimination against women

OA after some discussion...
Premise: The judge decided in favor of the women in 60% of GMAT discrimination cases
Conclusion: The judge has not discriminated against women in GMAT discrimination cases.

B) Many judges find it difficult to be objective in cases of GMAT discrimination against women
Does this mean that the judge in the passage is not objective? No - many judge does not equal all judges.
Also, even if the judge in the passage does find it difficult to be objective in cases of GMAT discrimination, we can't conclude that the judge wasn't objective. Difficult does not equal impossible.

E is the best answer because it says that more than 60% of those women should have won their cases.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 6:13 pm

by ramprakaashk » Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:36 pm
IMO : D . it says many cases are appealed from lower courts. It provides an alternate reason that we the people were not agreeing with the verdict of lower courts and then appealed to the higher courts. This gives us a room to infer that the judges in the lower court might have shown discrimination against women.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1