Johnson is on firm ground

kvcpk wrote:Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early editors of Dickinson’s poetry often distorted her intentions. Yet Johnson’s own, more faithful, text is still guilty of its own forms of distortion. To standardize Dickinson’s often indecipherable handwritten punctuation by the use of the dash is to render permanent a casual mode of poetic phrasing that Dickinson surely never expected to see in print. It implies that Dickinson chose the dash as her typical mark of punctuation when, in fact, she apparently never made any definitive choice at all.

Which of the following best summarizes the author’s main point?

(A) Although Johnson is right in criticizing Dickinson’s early editors for their distortion of her work, his own text is guilty of equally serious distortions. -- Restates the first sentence in the argument.
(B) Johnson’s use of the dash in his text of Dickinson’s poetry misleads readers about the poet’s intentions. - This is indicated by the last sentence which is highlighted.
(C) Because Dickinson never expected her poetry to be published, virtually any attempt at editing it must run counter to her intentions. -- not mentioned anywhere. that Dickinson never expected her poetry to be published..out of scope
(D) Although Johnson’s attempt to produce a more faithful text of Dickinson’s poetry is well-meaning, his study of the material lacks sufficient thoroughness. - this was tempting, but i eliminated it because of the word "well-meaning" which is nowhere implied in the argument.
(E) Dickinson’s editors, including Johnson, have failed to deal adequately with the problem of deciphering Dickinson’s handwritten manuscripts.--ignored this on the basis that it is never mentioned that Johnson was also an editor and also on the basis of the word "handwritten"

kvcpk wrote:I also chose A. But OA is B.

paes wrote:

kvcpk wrote:I also chose A. But OA is B.

I have seen my main point/inference problems where the problem maker confuses main point with inferece point or vice-versa..
I hope this is not an OG problem.
Because in all the OG problems, there is clear difference between main point and inference answers.

abhigang wrote:

kvcpk wrote:Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early editors of Dickinson’s poetry often distorted her intentions. Yet Johnson’s own, more faithful, text is still guilty of its own forms of distortion. To standardize Dickinson’s often indecipherable handwritten punctuation by the use of the dash is to render permanent a casual mode of poetic phrasing that Dickinson surely never expected to see in print. It implies that Dickinson chose the dash as her typical mark of punctuation when, in fact, she apparently never made any definitive choice at all.

Which of the following best summarizes the author’s main point?

(A) Although Johnson is right in criticizing Dickinson’s early editors for their distortion of her work, his own text is guilty of equally serious distortions. -- Restates the first sentence in the argument.
(B) Johnson’s use of the dash in his text of Dickinson’s poetry misleads readers about the poet’s intentions. - This is indicated by the last sentence which is highlighted.
(C) Because Dickinson never expected her poetry to be published, virtually any attempt at editing it must run counter to her intentions. -- not mentioned anywhere. that Dickinson never expected her poetry to be published..out of scope
(D) Although Johnson’s attempt to produce a more faithful text of Dickinson’s poetry is well-meaning, his study of the material lacks sufficient thoroughness. - this was tempting, but i eliminated it because of the word "well-meaning" which is nowhere implied in the argument.
(E) Dickinson’s editors, including Johnson, have failed to deal adequately with the problem of deciphering Dickinson’s handwritten manuscripts.--ignored this on the basis that it is never mentioned that Johnson was also an editor and also on the basis of the word "handwritten"

IMO B.