BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Joachim Raff and Giacomo Meyerbeer

Expert replies
by varundaga05 » Wed May 26, 2010 2:48 pm
Joachim Raff and Giacomo Meyerbeer are examples
of the kind of composer who receives popular acclaim
while living, often goes into decline after death, and
never regains popularity again.

(A) often goes into decline after death, and never
regains popularity again
(B) whose reputation declines after death and never
regains its status again
(C) but whose reputation declines after death and
never regains its former status
(D) who declines in reputation after death and who
never regained popularity again
(E) then has declined in reputation after death and
never regained popularity

Doubt - Why not B. except that it is using again which is redundtant.

As per OG for B - The two clauses are not parallel, lack a
coordinating conjunction, and do not
describe the same thing; redundant again.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Brian@VeritasPrep » Wed May 26, 2010 5:41 pm
Hey, varundaga05:

Good question - this one looks to be a fairly tough one.

With B, consider the events being listed:

...who receives acclaim
...whose reputation declines
...never regains its status

For those three things to be listed in a row, they would need to be in parallel form, as they compose a list of which the first two items are parallel. So, for one thing, the third item would need to have a modifier (like "who" or "whose") to be parallel.

Perhaps just as egregiously, choice B by not having a modifier there leaves the operators of "never regains its status" without a clear reference. Is it the composer, or is it the reputation?

Choice C, by introducing the word "but" to set up an independent clause, clears that up and avoids the lack-of-parallelism error by breaking the list into two clauses. Here, it is clear that the reputation loses its status (meaning that "its" is a proper pronoun; "its" couldn't describe "composer", so that's another ambiguity flaw with B), and because there is only one subject ("reputation"), the two verbs are parallel ("declines" and "regains").

Choice B's other flaw - the uses of "regains" and "again" - is that it uses redundant terms. The prefix "re-" means "again", so having both of those terms there just adds an unnecessary word to the sentence. The GMAT has expressed a clear preference for Brevity whenever possible, so if you're between two answers and can't find another difference, you should tend toward the shorter sentence.




One last note on the "regain...again" flaw, that's more for entertainment value than anything else, but may help to sell the point to some. Does anyone remember the song "Whoomp, There It Is" from back in the mid-90s? Quite a few of us at Veritas Prep headquarters are hip-hop music fans, and love to break down the GMAT-style logic and grammar of hip-hop when we can (we had a Hip-Hop Month in the GMAT tips section of our blog in March). Well, in that song, the opening line uttered by the one-hit wonder group "Tag Team" is:

"Tag Team, back again, check it to wreck it now let's begin..."

I've always been delightfully tickled by the ridiculous nature of those lyrics, given that Tag Team was a brand new band to the popular scene, and wouldn't be back...that was a flash in the pan. But if you take the lyrics, you have:

Tag Team...
Back (meaning that they had already been here before)
Again... (meaning that this was the SECOND time they were returning, which is ludicrous)

Tag Team would have failed GMAT Sentence Correction (okay by them...they made a fortune off that one song), and I've always found that example to be a great one at pointing out redundant terms.
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep

Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
Join the discussion

by samarpan_bschool » Thu May 27, 2010 1:02 pm
Choice C, by introducing the word "but" to set up an independent clause, clears that up and avoids the lack-of-parallelism error by breaking the list into two clauses. Here, it is clear that the reputation loses its status (meaning that "its" is a proper pronoun; "its" couldn't describe "composer", so that's another ambiguity flaw with B), and because there is only one subject ("reputation"), the two verbs are parallel ("declines" and "regains").
Hi Brian,

Thanks for the explanation. It will be great if you can clarify the following:

We say that the use of 'but' in option C sets up an independent clause (IC), but is 'whose reputation declines after death and never regains its former status' an independent clause? Can we start an IC with a possessive relative pronoun 'whose' ?

Thanks
Join the discussion

by Brian@VeritasPrep » Thu May 27, 2010 2:32 pm
Hey, samarpan:

Good call, and thanks for pointing that out. "...but whose reputation..." isn't an "independent" clause, because "whose" needs to refer back to "composers", so it isn't truly independent. I guess you'd call that a dependent clause, but the important thing for this sentence is that it is its own clause with a unique subject ("reputation") and verb ("regains"), so it forms a proper sentence.

Thanks for adding clarity!
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep

Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
Join the discussion

by gulrohit » Fri May 28, 2010 6:13 am
can anyone plz tell me .... what is the final answer ??
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:53 am
gulrohit wrote:can anyone plz tell me .... what is the final answer ??

C
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Tue Jun 01, 2010 2:01 am
gulrohit wrote:can anyone plz tell me .... what is the final answer ??

C
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1