BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

jets

Expert replies
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by maihuna » Tue Jan 06, 2009 12:03 pm
E is a correct option. reasoning is hazardous product has reduced from 90 per production worker to 40. If the no of workers are more now then the reasoning doesn't hold. so it is an assumption that in 1994 the no of passenger workers were not much less than current one...
Join the discussion

by cramya » Tue Jan 06, 2009 7:01 pm
One more for E)

Negate E and the conclusion falls apart.

The production worker counts have to remain more or less the same to say the progtram has successfully achieved its goal.
Join the discussion

by ronniecoleman » Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:56 pm
conclusion: the program is success!!!
1994 =90 per worker

now = 40 per worker


what is worker count increases so total waste/ total worker will go down ieven if the total waste remains the same.


IMO E
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Join the discussion

by graem83d » Fri May 13, 2016 3:34 am
I still feel E should be the answer
Join the discussion