BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Japanese and French

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pmFollowed by: 11 members
Thanked: 331 times

by cramya » Fri Dec 19, 2008 7:37 am
let x be total no of students studying Japanese

let y -> French

Stmt II is telling us

that .04y = .10x

x/y = 5/2

2x = 5y

This means y<x i.e no of students studying french is lesser than numbe of students studying Japanese

B)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 546
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: New Delhi , India
Thanked: 13 times

Re: Japanese and French

by ronniecoleman » Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:18 am
shafeek wrote:Please let me know how this conclusion can be reached...

Image
where is the question?

have i gone blind ?
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 574
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 8:48 am
Location: Bangalore
Thanked: 28 times

by vishubn » Sat Dec 27, 2008 12:21 am
a bit more cramya??? !!

i mean wats the point of mentioning atleast 100 students study japanese ! there should some use of this info right ?? ?

and also

if T is the total !

then chances are
total=F+J + both french and japan - neither !!

am i thinking tooo much ?? :(

vishu
KILL !! DIE !! or BEAT my FEAR !!! de@D END!!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pmFollowed by: 11 members
Thanked: 331 times

by cramya » Sat Dec 27, 2008 12:23 am
The question is saying Japanese >= 100. Imo I dont see this info being used anywhere since the question is not asking us to find numbers but just find out if Japanese more than French which u can from the ratios.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 574
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 8:48 am
Location: Bangalore
Thanked: 28 times

by vishubn » Sat Dec 27, 2008 12:27 am
OVER sighted thought of mine !!

thans cramya !!

vishu
KILL !! DIE !! or BEAT my FEAR !!! de@D END!!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 833
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:56 am
Thanked: 13 times

by vivek.kapoor83 » Fri Jan 02, 2009 12:01 am
Agree that stmt 2 is suff

but from stmt 1 : .04x = 16 (x = total french students)
x =400
Japnese=100
So, Suff Isnt it...pls explain whwere i m amking mistake
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 259
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:30 pm
Thanked: 16 times

by amitabhprasad » Fri Jan 02, 2009 6:28 pm
cramya wrote:The question is saying Japanese >= 100. Imo I dont see this info being used anywhere since the question is not asking us to find numbers but just find out if Japanese more than French which u can from the ratios.
Don't we need at least 100 students to check statement 1
Statement 1:
16 study both French and Japanese
if # of French = y
then 4%of y = 16 study both
==>y = 400
since number of Japanese >100
So statement 1 is insufficient ?
Did I missed any thing ?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 6:27 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

by cooperbaker » Sat Jan 03, 2009 12:45 pm
vivek.kapoor83 wrote:Agree that stmt 2 is suff

but from stmt 1 : .04x = 16 (x = total french students)
x =400
Japnese=100
So, Suff Isnt it...pls explain whwere i m amking mistake

Question says AT LEAST 100 students study Japanese, this number could be 401, because stmt 1 doesn't utilize the number of students studying Japanese at all, we can't compare.

Am I correct or am I missing something?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pmFollowed by: 11 members
Thanked: 331 times

by cramya » Sat Jan 03, 2009 6:35 pm
Am I correct or am I missing something?
Yes u r correct.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1