BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Japan's rainfall

Expert replies
by amysky_0205 » Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:20 am
Japan's abundant rainfall and the typically mild temperature throughout most of the country have produced a lush vegetation cover and, despite the mountainous terrain and generally poor soils, it has made possible the raising of a variety of crops.
A. it has made possible the raising of
B. has made it possible for them to raise
C. have made it possible to raise
D. have made it possible for raising
E. thus making it possible for them to raise


OA: C

can someone explain what's wrong with each options? thank u!!!
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by challenger63 » Mon Jan 21, 2013 2:28 am
I am not an expert, so I can make mistakes. If you see a mistake, please notify me.

Japan's abundant rainfall and the typically mild temperature throughout most of the country have produced a lush vegetation cover and, despite the mountainous terrain and generally poor soils, it has made possible the raising of a variety of crops.
A. it has made possible the raising of

>>>
Subject is plural - "rainfall" and "mild temperature". Thus,"it" is wrong pronoun here.

There is no comma before "and". Thus, it is not independent clause. Verb should refer to the initial verb. "despite...." is just a descriptive phrase here. So, we can't use "it" here.



B. has made it possible for them to raise
>> Subject is plural, so "has" is wrong. "Them" who??

C. have made it possible to raise
>>> Good one. Construction "to make it..." is a standard construction which allows "undefined" it.

D. have made it possible for raising
>> "possible to do something" is better than "for raising". Can't explain this. It sounds wrong.

In my view, it should like this:
It is possible that somebody does something
It is possible to do something
It is possible for somebody to do something.


E. thus making it possible for them to raise
>> "making" is not parallel to the initial verb - "have produced"
"them" is ambiguous.


POE: C
Join the discussion

by aman88 » Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:19 am
amysky_0205 wrote:Japan's abundant rainfall and the typically mild temperature throughout most of the country have produced a lush vegetation cover and, despite the mountainous terrain and generally poor soils, it has made possible the raising of a variety of crops.
A. it has made possible the raising of
B. has made it possible for them to raise
C. have made it possible to raise
D. have made it possible for raising
E. thus making it possible for them to raise


OA: C

can someone explain what's wrong with each options? thank u!!!
challenger63 is right. But apart from what he said, subject-verb agreement is the main lookout.

Japan's abundant rainfall and the typically mild temperature throughout most of the country have produced ..., it has made possible the raising of a variety of crops.

A and B have produced ... and HAVE made it possible ... -> This is how this sentence should be read.

Now look at the answer choices: A, B and E are out at first glance.
Among C and D, look for further errors. As challenger63 mentioned above, choice D is wordy and unidiomatic. Moreover, the VERB + ing construction should be avoided in the GMAT.

Thus, C is the right answer.

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Mon Jan 21, 2013 6:31 pm
This question is particularly tricky because it employs two different uses of the pronoun IT.

As others have pointed out, the subject is plural - RAINFALL and TEMPERATURE. This means that we can't use the subject pronoun "it" in the original sentence, as it would refer to a plural subject. Nor could we have a singular verb HAS, as in B.

The other answer choices also contain IT, but in a different context. TO MAKE IT POSSIBLE is an idiomatic expression, and within idiomatic expressions, we can sometimes use vague pronouns that don't have a specific antecedent. Generally speaking, the GMAT doesn't like vague pronouns, unless they're in idiomatic expressions, such as It is raining, etc.

In E, there is a different pronoun problem: THEM. Who is the "them" raising the variety of crops? The rainfall and the temperature? The Japanese people? If it's the former, that doesn't make much sense. If the latter, we don't actually have that antecedent in the sentence, so THEM is incorrect.

When choosing between C and D, we're left with an idiom distinction: MAKE IT POSSIBLE TO DO or MAKE IT POSSIBLE FOR DOING. As with other idioms, there's no rule here. MAKE IT POSSIBLE TO DO is simply the preferred form.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

by arias » Sat Mar 09, 2013 10:44 am
ceilidh.erickson wrote:This question is particularly tricky because it employs two different uses of the pronoun IT.

As others have pointed out, the subject is plural - RAINFALL and TEMPERATURE. This means that we can't use the subject pronoun "it" in the original sentence, as it would refer to a plural subject. Nor could we have a singular verb HAS, as in B.

The other answer choices also contain IT, but in a different context. TO MAKE IT POSSIBLE is an idiomatic expression, and within idiomatic expressions, we can sometimes use vague pronouns that don't have a specific antecedent. Generally speaking, the GMAT doesn't like vague pronouns, unless they're in idiomatic expressions, such as It is raining, etc.

In E, there is a different pronoun problem: THEM. Who is the "them" raising the variety of crops? The rainfall and the temperature? The Japanese people? If it's the former, that doesn't make much sense. If the latter, we don't actually have that antecedent in the sentence, so THEM is incorrect.

When choosing between C and D, we're left with an idiom distinction: MAKE IT POSSIBLE TO DO or MAKE IT POSSIBLE FOR DOING. As with other idioms, there's no rule here. MAKE IT POSSIBLE TO DO is simply the preferred form.
Hi expert:

Could you please explain what is the difference between below sentence.
Japen's rainall and temperature have made it possible to raise a variety of crops.
Japen's rainall and temperature have made it possible for japanese to raise a variety of crops.

What is the agent of the action to raise, or who/what raise, if we do not explicite for japanese here?

I ask this question is because I remember Ron's explain of same structure for a prep question
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/hea ... t3173.html

I quote the explain from Ron:

* "heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action" is awkward and difficult to read. (you may have to be a native speaker to pick up on this, though)

much more importantly:
* makes it likely to miss...
this doesn't work.
technically, this would mean that "it" - an unspecified entity - is likely to miss the signs.
if you use the "it is ADJ..." construction, and the verb has a specific subject, you MUST include that subject in the construction. it is likely that the executive will miss...

The take away I can get is we can not inplicate the agent for the TO DO, otherwise the reader will keep on asking: Hey! who miss signs of incipient trouble ?

Many thanks
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1