BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Jack's aunt

Expert replies
by honganhbui » Sun Aug 24, 2008 7:49 am
Jack’s aunt gave him her will, asking him to make it public when she died; he promised to do so. After her death, Jack looked at the will: it stipulated that all her money go to her friend George. Jack knew that if he made the will public, George would squander the money benefiting neither George nor anyone else. Jack also knew that if he did not make the will public, the money would go to his own mother, who would use it to benefit herself and others, harming no one. After reflection, he decided not to make the will public.
Which one of the following principles, if valid, would require Jack to act as he did in the situation described?
(A) Duties to family members take priority over duties to people who are not family members.
(B) Violating a promise is impermissible whenever doing so would become known by others.
(C) One must choose an alternative that benefits some and harms no one over an alternative that harms some and benefits no one.
(D) When faced with alternatives it is obligatory to choose whichever one will benefit the greatest number of people.
(E) A promise becomes nonbinding when the person to whom the promise was made is no longer living.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by raunekk » Sun Aug 24, 2008 8:35 am
imo:B

Source pls,,,:)

Neva seen a CR like this one,,,,!!!
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Sun Aug 24, 2008 8:39 am
why not C or D raunekk?
Join the discussion

by raunekk » Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:04 am
@niraj_a

imo,

firstly i cannot understand which type it belongs 2..:)

I felt its a bit close to an assumption question.

so i tried using negation on B...and it hurts d conclusion...!! so went for B

Well.. it can be C or D too...

not confident...

Frankly neva seen such kind :)
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:12 am
yeah, i thought it was assumption too like you...lol

would love to see what the OA turns out to be
Join the discussion

by California4jx » Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:58 am
IMO: C
Join the discussion

by NSNguyen » Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:53 am
IMO: C
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
Join the discussion

by banker1 » Tue Aug 26, 2008 9:41 am
IMO: C

The following is what led me to C: George would squander the money benefiting neither George nor anyone else.

C states: One must choose an alternative that benefits some and harms no one over an alternative that harms some and benefits no one.

As the passage states, George would squander the money and not be harmed, no on else would benefit.
Join the discussion

by anju » Tue Aug 26, 2008 2:49 pm
I'll go with C too.

The stem asks the priciple would require Jack to act as he did in the situation described and Jack acted on the principle based on Option C.

What's the OA?
Join the discussion

by stubbornp » Tue Aug 26, 2008 9:53 pm
imo C
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:53 pm
My vote also goes for 'C'. I have never seen a question like this before :-)
Join the discussion

by pkamoako » Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:48 am
According to passage
George would squander the money benefiting neither George nor anyone else. But C is saying that George will harm some one so I feel like C is incorrect. I will give my vote to D.[/b]
Join the discussion

by banker1 » Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:57 am
pkamoako wrote:According to passage
George would squander the money benefiting neither George nor anyone else. But C is saying that George will harm some one so I feel like C is incorrect. I will give my vote to D.[/b]
George isn't going to harm anyone...

C said another way: Choose an alternative that benefits some and doesn't hurt anyone over an alternative hurts some and benefits no one.

Since George will squander the money he will not benefit from it and others will be hurt whereas if the money is given away others would benefit and George will not be hurt (since he would squander the money in the first place).
Join the discussion

by sestri » Wed Sep 17, 2008 4:58 pm
I vote for 'C'
Join the discussion

by event_horizon » Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:49 pm
me C too.
Join the discussion