BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

It is naive

Expert replies
by YellowSapphire » Tue Apr 12, 2011 3:06 am
Lenore: It is naive to think that historical explanations can be objective. In evaluating evidence, historians are always influenced by their national, political, and class loyalties.
Victor: Still, the very fact that cases of biased thinking have been detected and sources of bias identified shows that there are people who can maintain objectivity.

Victor's response does not succeed as a rebuttal of Lenore's argument because his response

(A) displays the same kind of biased thinking as that against which Lenore's argument it directed
(B) does not address the special case of historians who purposely distort evidence in order to promote their own political objectives
(C) fails to provide examples of cases in which biased thinking has been detected and the source of that bias identified
(D) does not consider sources of bias in historical explanation other than those that are due to national, political, and class loyalties
(E) overlooks the possibility that those who detect and identify bias are themselves biased in some way

OA: E
Last edited by YellowSapphire on Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:24 am, edited 2 times in total.
Yellow Sapphire
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by HSPA » Tue Apr 12, 2011 3:23 am
1)it is wrong to think X can have proofs. historians are biased by Y
2) Biased cases are found and historians are biased based on proof

Why is 2 wrong?
Opinion: proofs in [2] are wrong

IMO D... It gave me a tough 3.30min... I am skeptic about my answer
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by amitu » Tue Apr 12, 2011 3:34 am
E
the argument is based on premise that people are biased .
Join the discussion

by champmag » Tue Apr 12, 2011 3:39 am
+1 for E. According to Victor's argument the very fact that biased thinking is detected is the reason for objectivity to exist. What if the person who is detecting the biased thinking is himself biased. Then there would be no room for objectivity. So Op E captures this correctly.
Join the discussion

by force5 » Tue Apr 12, 2011 4:58 am
little difficult.

B says political objectives (out)
C- example not needed wont help ( out)
D- source of bias not needed (Out)

left with A and E.

liked A but then on a deeper thought removed A.
(A), perhaps not because, Lenore's comment was not against biased historians or any bias in particular. So, when Victor speaks about bias he forgets to understand that the people who have detected some historians to be biased, could have been biased as well. So, (E) fits in well here.
Join the discussion

by rahul_tgsp » Tue Apr 12, 2011 7:54 am
i ll go with E
Join the discussion

by Sharma_Gaurav » Sun Mar 25, 2012 2:48 am
I have serious doubts regarding the wordings of option E.

If this option said (E) overlooks the possibility that those who detect and identify bias CAN BE themselves biased in some way.

Then E would have been more clearer or serious contender. Well how can we definitely say for sure that ppl who are detecting are biased already????/

Experts please explain and throw some more night on this??
Join the discussion