“Corporations and other businesses should try to eliminate the many ranks and salary grades that classify employees according to their experience and expertise. A ‘flat’ organizational structure is more likely to encourage collegiality and cooperation among employees.”
The author of the topic states that everyone in a business organization must be equal and there should be no ranking and salary grading based on any criteria. While the concept of considering everyone to be equal will encourage employees to express their views and opinions, the idea of the topic fails to consider the importance of management. In reality, no company with the structure suggested by the topic can survive long.
Firstly, the level of ranks and salary are determined by the performance and working attitude of a particular person. Seniors in a higher rank sets examples to their subordinates to follow. The classification of employees is beneficial to the company because it clearly conveys the business objective and goal to the juniors. It is also the main reason why there are so many bestsellers with contents on business leaders such as Richard Branson.
Moreover, loyalty of an employee attributes to the sense of prestigious provided by the company. A higher ranking and a more competitive salary are effective tools to retain valuable employees. They are the most effective initiatives to motivate employees.
My final point is that seniors with more experience and expertise have better judgment and decision making skills. Their experiences on handling risks, resolving conflict and managing tasks are crucial to business operation. Different levels of working class should have different area of job responsibilities. A working team is likely to be in chaos if there is no decision maker to give directions. For instance, finance secretary of the state focuses on managing the financial crisis but he is not likely to interfere with the policies made by the president.
In summary, the suggestion of a flat organizational structure is not justifiable. Every task or project has limited resources. There is always a need for a leader to give clear guidance and identify potential flaws and risks of work.
The author of the topic states that everyone in a business organization must be equal and there should be no ranking and salary grading based on any criteria. While the concept of considering everyone to be equal will encourage employees to express their views and opinions, the idea of the topic fails to consider the importance of management. In reality, no company with the structure suggested by the topic can survive long.
Firstly, the level of ranks and salary are determined by the performance and working attitude of a particular person. Seniors in a higher rank sets examples to their subordinates to follow. The classification of employees is beneficial to the company because it clearly conveys the business objective and goal to the juniors. It is also the main reason why there are so many bestsellers with contents on business leaders such as Richard Branson.
Moreover, loyalty of an employee attributes to the sense of prestigious provided by the company. A higher ranking and a more competitive salary are effective tools to retain valuable employees. They are the most effective initiatives to motivate employees.
My final point is that seniors with more experience and expertise have better judgment and decision making skills. Their experiences on handling risks, resolving conflict and managing tasks are crucial to business operation. Different levels of working class should have different area of job responsibilities. A working team is likely to be in chaos if there is no decision maker to give directions. For instance, finance secretary of the state focuses on managing the financial crisis but he is not likely to interfere with the policies made by the president.
In summary, the suggestion of a flat organizational structure is not justifiable. Every task or project has limited resources. There is always a need for a leader to give clear guidance and identify potential flaws and risks of work.
