BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

is z – y = y – x?

Expert replies
by mehravikas » Sat Aug 01, 2009 9:05 pm
If x, y, and z are integers, and x < y < z, is z – y = y – x?

(1) The mean of the set {x, y, z, 4} is greater than the mean of the set {x, y, z}.
(2) The median of the set {x, y, z, 4} is less than the median of the set {x, y, z}.


Source: MGMAT
OA: C
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by real2008 » Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:32 am
i think answer is E
Join the discussion

by zeenab » Mon Aug 03, 2009 11:44 am
Hi,

1)
Mean of {x,y,z,4} > Mean of {x,y,z}

This means that atleast 2 numbers in x y z are less than 4. This condition can only bring the mean higher by adding 4 to the set.
Also solving this
(x+y+z+4)/4 > (x+y+z)/3
gives x+y+z < 12

however the set can be anything in the range
x,y,z = 1,3,5 , or 1,2,8
Insufficient

2)
Median of {x,y,z,4} < {x,y,z}
This does not restrict the values of x,y,z
4 can be anywhere, so the sorted order can be anything
4,x,y,z
x,4,y,z
x,y,4,z
x,y,z,4

Median of {x,y,z} = y
for the median of {x,y,z,4} to be less than y,
these two are only possible
4,x,y,z
x,4,y,z

still it doesnt give us much information about how the numbers are spread.
Insufficient.

Now lets try to combine the two.

x+y+z < 12 from 1)

from 2) firstchoice is out, 4,x,y,z as we cannot have the above condition with this.

So the choice is x,4,y,z and x+y+z < 12

I dont think its possible for the values of x,y,z to satisfy both the conditions. So we can know that z-y not equal to y-x.

Can someone confirm?
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:25 pm
Your explanation is in sync with MGMAT's explanation. However, I am looking for a shorter way to solve this problem.

Thanks,
Vikas
zeenab wrote:Hi,

1)
Mean of {x,y,z,4} > Mean of {x,y,z}

This means that atleast 2 numbers in x y z are less than 4. This condition can only bring the mean higher by adding 4 to the set.
Also solving this
(x+y+z+4)/4 > (x+y+z)/3
gives x+y+z < 12

however the set can be anything in the range
x,y,z = 1,3,5 , or 1,2,8
Insufficient

2)
Median of {x,y,z,4} < {x,y,z}
This does not restrict the values of x,y,z
4 can be anywhere, so the sorted order can be anything
4,x,y,z
x,4,y,z
x,y,4,z
x,y,z,4

Median of {x,y,z} = y
for the median of {x,y,z,4} to be less than y,
these two are only possible
4,x,y,z
x,4,y,z

still it doesnt give us much information about how the numbers are spread.
Insufficient.

Now lets try to combine the two.

x+y+z < 12 from 1)

from 2) firstchoice is out, 4,x,y,z as we cannot have the above condition with this.

So the choice is x,4,y,z and x+y+z < 12

I dont think its possible for the values of x,y,z to satisfy both the conditions. So we can know that z-y not equal to y-x.

Can someone confirm?
Join the discussion

by tohellandback » Mon Aug 03, 2009 9:22 pm
I don't think there is any shorter way to solve this:
best you can do is substitute numbers for 1 and 2 but you still need to do consider a few cases when you combine both:
my solution:

is z – y = y – x or 2y=x+z. basically asking whether y is the arithmetic mean of the numbers x,y and z

1) not sufficient.
take the set (2,3,4) and then take (1,2,5)
in (2,3,4) 3 is the AM. while in (2,2,5), 2 is not.

2) take the numbers (4,6,8) and then take the numbers (4,5,10)
not sufficient.

combining
from 2,
x+y+z/3<x+y+z+4/4
x+y+z/3-x+y+z/4<1
x+y+z/12<1
x+y+z<12

from 1,
the only form will be (x,4,y,z) because
if you take (4,x,y,z). X is atleast 4 y atleast 5 and z atleast 6 and the sum will be >12

if you take x,y,z,4- the new median will be Y+z/2 which is greater than y so not possible
so the form is (x,y,4,z)

new median less than Y

4+y/2< y
4+y<2y
y>4

take Y values >4, z>Y and sum of X Y and Z <12.
there will be no set where Y is the mean.
Answer C
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion