BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is xy > 0?

Expert replies
by Fractal » Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:04 am
Is xy > 0?

(1) x - y > -2
(2) x - 2y < -6

Is the following approach correct?

First I multiplied the statement (2) with -1:
(2) -x + 2y > 6

Now I added statement (1) and statement (2):
(1) x - y > -2
(2) -x + 2y > 6

results in y > 4

Then I use this expression in combination with statement (1) (I add it):
(1) x - y > -2
y > 4

results in x > 2

Therefore, x > 2 and y > 4 and hence xy = positive

Correct answer: C

I am not sure whether I can do these calculations like this. Could somebody clarify? Or also give a better strategy to solve this question?

Thx a lot
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by cans » Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:33 am
Your method is correct.
1) x > y-2. x=1,y=-2. xy <0 also x=4,y=3,xy>0 insufficient
2) x < 2y-6. y=3, x=-1, xy<0 and y=4,x=1, xy>0 insufficient
1&2) y-2 < x < 2y-6.
thus y>4. and x>y-2 >2
xy>0
Sufficient
IMO C
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!
Join the discussion

by Fractal » Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:41 am
cans wrote:Your method is correct.
1) x > y-2. x=1,y=-2. xy <0 also x=4,y=3,xy>0 insufficient
2) x < 2y-6. y=3, x=-1, xy<0 and y=4,x=1, xy>0 insufficient
1&2) y-2 < x < 2y-6.
thus y>4. and x>y-2 >2
xy>0
Sufficient
IMO C
Ok thanks! But I am not able to follow your approach! As far as I can see, you just plug in some different number in statement (1) and (2). But then I don't understand, how you combine these two statements? Could you tell me plz? Thx a lot
Join the discussion

by knight247 » Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:54 am
@Fractal
When you combine both statements u can take an algebraic approach.
x - y > -2
and
-6> x - 2y

Add both

x-y-6 > x-2y-2
y>4
Lets assume y=5 which satisfies the above condition.

Put y=5 in statement 1 and 2

x-5>-2
x>3

x-2(5)<-6
x<4

Combining we get 3<x<4 Meaning x is +ve and we already know that y is +ve. So their product is +ve. Hence C
Join the discussion

by cans » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:01 am
Fractal wrote:
cans wrote:Your method is correct.
1) x > y-2. x=1,y=-2. xy <0 also x=4,y=3,xy>0 insufficient
2) x < 2y-6. y=3, x=-1, xy<0 and y=4,x=1, xy>0 insufficient
1&2) y-2 < x < 2y-6.
thus y>4. and x>y-2 >2
xy>0
Sufficient
IMO C
Ok thanks! But I am not able to follow your approach! As far as I can see, you just plug in some different number in statement (1) and (2). But then I don't understand, how you combine these two statements? Could you tell me plz? Thx a lot
1 plugged in numbers in 1 and 2, to show they are not sufficient. ant for C),
if x>a and x<b we can say that b>x>a or b>a...
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!
Join the discussion

by Fractal » Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:01 am
please note the following rules:

you CAN add inequalities with the same direction,
and you can subtract opposite inequalities, but not the other way
around. For example, since we know that:

5 > 4 and
3 > 1

we can add them and know that:

8 > 5

but we can't subtract them and get:

2 > 3 (WRONG!)

However, we can write it as:

5 > 4 and
1 < 3

and then we can subtract them:

4 > 1

but we can't add them:

6 > 7 (WRONG!)
Join the discussion

by Fractal » Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:03 am
if you prefer adding, just multiply by -1:

5 > 4 and --> 5 > 4
1 < 3 --> -1 > -3
---------
4 > 1
Join the discussion