BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is XY>0?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by pradeepsarathy » Sat Aug 29, 2009 5:57 am
IMO C

Stmt 1 -

x-y>-2

Let x = 4 y = -2, x-y = 6 > -2 but xy < 0
Let x = 4 y = 2, x-y = 2 > -2 but xy > 0

Hence insufficient

Stms 2 -

x-2y > -6

Let x = 10 y = 2 x-2y = 6 > -6 but xy>0
Let x= 10 y = -2 x-2y = 14 > -6 but xy< 0

Hence insufficient

Stmt 1 and Stmt 2 -

subtracting both the stmt - y > 4
Let say y = 5, substitute this value in stmts 2
=>x > 4

Since both x and y are positive, xy has to be positive.

Hence sufficient.
Join the discussion

Re: Is XY>0?

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Sat Aug 29, 2009 10:30 am
crazy4gmat wrote:Is XY>0?

(1) X-Y > -2
(2) X-2y > -6
Let's start by rephrasing the question.

When will xy be greater than 0? When x and y are the same sign. So, we can ask:

Do x and y have the same sign?

(Note: if either one equals 0, we get an automatic "no" answer to the question.)

Let's look at the statements in general using some basic number properties rules.

If x is positive and y is negative, each statement reduces to:

(positive - negative) > (negative)

Since subtracting a negative is the same as adding a positive, we can rewrite this as:

(positive + positive) > (negative)

which is, of course, always true.

So, we can definitely pick a positive x and a negative y to get a "NO" answer to the original question.

Next we have to see if can get a "YES" answer to the original question, i.e. can we make them both positive or both negative.

Both negative is probably easier, so let's start there.

We're subtracting y from x in both statements, so let's pick a "big" negative y and a "small" negative x.

If x = -1 and y = -100, we get:

1) -1 - (-100) > -2

-1 + 100 > -2

99 > -2.

This inequality is true, so -1 and -100 are permissible numbers. Is (-1)(-100)>0? YES.

2) -1 - 2(-100) > -6

-1 + 200 > -6

199 > -6

This inequality is true, so -1 and -100 are permissible numbers. Is (-1)(-100)>0? YES.

So, even after combining, we can pick two negatives OR a negative and a positive: insufficient, choose (E).
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by tienvunguyen » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:57 am
pradeepsarathy wrote:IMO C

Stmt 1 -

x-y>-2

Let x = 4 y = -2, x-y = 6 > -2 but xy < 0
Let x = 4 y = 2, x-y = 2 > -2 but xy > 0

Hence insufficient

Stms 2 -

x-2y > -6

Let x = 10 y = 2 x-2y = 6 > -6 but xy>0
Let x= 10 y = -2 x-2y = 14 > -6 but xy< 0

Hence insufficient

Stmt 1 and Stmt 2 -

subtracting both the stmt - y > 4
Let say y = 5, substitute this value in stmts 2
=>x > 4

Since both x and y are positive, xy has to be positive.

Hence sufficient.
I don't think you can simply subtract both statements because:

a > b
c > d

do not mean a - c > b - d

For example, 4 > -4 & 3 > -6 but 4-3 < -4 -(-6).

So far, Stuart's solution is the only solution I can think of. Don't know if there is a better way than number testing because I can see myself spending a lot of time on number testing.
Join the discussion