BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is x + y > x y?

Expert replies
by sanju09 » Tue Aug 10, 2010 4:46 am
Is x + y > x y?

(1) x > 0 > y.

(2) |y| = x.


[spoiler]Source: www.catprep.com[/spoiler]
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by gig92 » Tue Aug 10, 2010 4:56 am
sanju09 wrote:Is x + y > x y?

(1) x > 0 > y.

(2) |y| = x.


[spoiler]Source: www.catprep.com[/spoiler]

From question, is x > y(x-1)

1) x>0>y

however, x can have any real value therefore not sufficient because x be +ve or -ve thus giving different answer for statement 1

2) |y| = x

Once again y = +x OR y = -x
Being a real number x can have any value. Not sufficient.

Ans:E
gig92
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Wed Aug 11, 2010 3:12 am
the above post is wrong; the correct answer should be (c), not (e).
Is x + y > x y?
it's probably best not to rephrase this statement, since the two elements on either side of the inequality -- a sum on one side, and a product on the other side -- are really easy to think about.
it's possible to move things over and factor the expression, as the poster above me just did, but that creates an expression that is much harder to think about with any significant degree of intuition.

(1) x > 0 > y. [/quote]

this just means that x is positive and y is negative.

getting a "yes" to the question is easy; xy is always negative, so, if you create a situation in which x is positive, then you will get a "yes".
try x = 3, y = -2.
1 > -6, so "yes".

to get a "no" to the question, you need to make (x + y) even more negative than xy. one way to do this is to take advantage of the fact that multiplying by a tiny decimal creates a really small number, but adding to a really tiny decimal doesn't have much of an effect:
try x = 0.001, y = -10.
then -9.999 < -0.01, so "no".

insufficient.
(2) |y| = x.
this means that x is positive or 0, and y is either x or -x.

the easiest way to get a "no" is to let x = y = 0, in which case 0 = 0 (not ">").

to get a "yes", just let y = -x. in this case, the product will be negative, but the sum will be zero (since the numbers are opposites).
e.g., if x = 2 and y = -2, then 0 > -4, so "yes".

insufficient.

--

together:

in this case, x is positive, and y is the opposite of x.
if that's true, then the sum of (x + y) must be 0, and the product (xy) must be negative.
0 is always greater than a negative number, so these statements together are sufficient.

answer (c)

--

to the poster in the previous post -- it doesn't look as though you actually thought about considering the statements together! it seems that you just thought you were done, and picked (e), as soon as you ascertained that both individual statements are insufficient.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by gig92 » Sun Aug 15, 2010 10:26 am
Thanks Ron, appreciate your advice.
gig92
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Sun Aug 15, 2010 9:07 pm
gig92 wrote:Thanks Ron, appreciate your advice.
glad it helped.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion