BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is x + y < 1 ?

Expert replies
by asht » Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:23 am
Is x + y < 1 ?

1. x < 8/9
2. y < 1/8

I answered C, but unfortunately it was shown as wrong. The given OA answer didn't make any sense to me. Pls help!

OA is E
Last edited by asht on Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by DanaJ » Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:29 am
Each stmt by itself is obviously insufficient, since we need to know info about both x and y to solve the problem. Now, take them both together:
1. -x < 8/9 makes x > -8/9
2. -y < 1/8 makes y > -1/8

Now, as you can see, this info is not enough as well. Consider x = y = 0: this means that indeed x + y < 1. But, if you take say x = 2 and y = 1, then x + y > 1.
This is why the OA is E
Join the discussion

by praxis » Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:31 am
When you multiply an inequality by a negative number, the sense of the inequality is reversed. For example, take " x < 1 ". Multiply by -1, and reverse the sense to get " -x > -1 ", not " -x < -1 ".

(1) subtract 1, and multiply by -1 to get
x > 1/9
(2) subtract 2, and multipy by -1 to get
y > 15/8

I think they're sufficient together. What is the source? Perhaps there's a typo in the question or your posting?
Want more practice GMAT questions? check out
https://www.testsandtutors.com/course/view.php/GMAT
Join the discussion

by praxis » Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:38 am
Hah, I read the (1) and (2) in the question as part of the equations.

Pretend I said what DanaJ said.

Moving right along....
Want more practice GMAT questions? check out
https://www.testsandtutors.com/course/view.php/GMAT
Join the discussion

Ques edited

by asht » Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:43 am
Hi DanaJ, its not -x.

I have edited the ques, the hyphen was misconstrued as -ve sign
DanaJ wrote:Each stmt by itself is obviously insufficient, since we need to know info about both x and y to solve the problem. Now, take them both together:
1. -x < 8/9 makes x > -8/9
2. -y < 1/8 makes y > -1/8

Now, as you can see, this info is not enough as well. Consider x = y = 0: this means that indeed x + y < 1. But, if you take say x = 2 and y = 1, then x + y > 1.
This is why the OA is E
Join the discussion

Source is GmatPrep

by asht » Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:44 am
The source of Ques and OA is GMAT Prep
Join the discussion

by DanaJ » Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:49 am
OK then, let's look at it again:
So you have that x < 8/9 and y < 1/8. The trick here is to notice that y is smaller than 1/8 INSTEAD of 1/9. If you had that:
x < 8/9
y < 1/9
--------
x + y would indeed be smaller than 1.
But since 1/8 > 1/9, you get that there is a small chance that y might be in that interval between 1/9 and 1/8. Look at this:
x < 8/9
y < 1/8
--------
x + y < 8/9 + 1/8 or x + y < 73/72.
It's that small portion of (73/72 - 1) = 1/72 that gives you the headache.
This is why I'm sticking by my answer.
Join the discussion

by sacx » Tue Mar 10, 2009 4:28 am
it is easier to convert it into decimals and then solve

x < 8/9 ~0.888
y < 1/8 ~0.125

Case I: now lets suppose x = 0.887 and y = 0.124

x +y = 1.011 >1

Case I: now lets suppose x = 0.6 and y = 0.1

x +y = 0.7 <1

Hence the answer should be E
SACX
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Tue Oct 04, 2011 6:15 am
asht wrote:Is x + y < 1 ?

1. x < 8/9
2. y < 1/8

I answered C, but unfortunately it was shown as wrong. The given OA answer didn't make any sense to me. Pls help!

OA is E
Lets plug in values,

1) X should be 0.888888888888887 or lesser
2) Y should be 0.1025 or lesser

1+2) x+y = 1.013, which is greater than 1 (max value)
1+2) x+y = 0.001+0.001 = 0.002, which is less than 1

So insufficient!

IMO:E
Join the discussion