BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is x + y < 1 ?

Expert replies
by asht » Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:23 am
Is x + y < 1 ?

1. x < 8/9
2. y < 1/8

I answered C, but unfortunately it was shown as wrong. The given OA answer didn't make any sense to me. Pls help!

OA is E
Last edited by asht on Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by DanaJ » Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:29 am
Each stmt by itself is obviously insufficient, since we need to know info about both x and y to solve the problem. Now, take them both together:
1. -x < 8/9 makes x > -8/9
2. -y < 1/8 makes y > -1/8

Now, as you can see, this info is not enough as well. Consider x = y = 0: this means that indeed x + y < 1. But, if you take say x = 2 and y = 1, then x + y > 1.
This is why the OA is E
Join the discussion

by praxis » Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:31 am
When you multiply an inequality by a negative number, the sense of the inequality is reversed. For example, take " x < 1 ". Multiply by -1, and reverse the sense to get " -x > -1 ", not " -x < -1 ".

(1) subtract 1, and multiply by -1 to get
x > 1/9
(2) subtract 2, and multipy by -1 to get
y > 15/8

I think they're sufficient together. What is the source? Perhaps there's a typo in the question or your posting?
Want more practice GMAT questions? check out
https://www.testsandtutors.com/course/view.php/GMAT
Join the discussion

by praxis » Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:38 am
Hah, I read the (1) and (2) in the question as part of the equations.

Pretend I said what DanaJ said.

Moving right along....
Want more practice GMAT questions? check out
https://www.testsandtutors.com/course/view.php/GMAT
Join the discussion

Ques edited

by asht » Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:43 am
Hi DanaJ, its not -x.

I have edited the ques, the hyphen was misconstrued as -ve sign
DanaJ wrote:Each stmt by itself is obviously insufficient, since we need to know info about both x and y to solve the problem. Now, take them both together:
1. -x < 8/9 makes x > -8/9
2. -y < 1/8 makes y > -1/8

Now, as you can see, this info is not enough as well. Consider x = y = 0: this means that indeed x + y < 1. But, if you take say x = 2 and y = 1, then x + y > 1.
This is why the OA is E
Join the discussion

Source is GmatPrep

by asht » Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:44 am
The source of Ques and OA is GMAT Prep
Join the discussion

by DanaJ » Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:49 am
OK then, let's look at it again:
So you have that x < 8/9 and y < 1/8. The trick here is to notice that y is smaller than 1/8 INSTEAD of 1/9. If you had that:
x < 8/9
y < 1/9
--------
x + y would indeed be smaller than 1.
But since 1/8 > 1/9, you get that there is a small chance that y might be in that interval between 1/9 and 1/8. Look at this:
x < 8/9
y < 1/8
--------
x + y < 8/9 + 1/8 or x + y < 73/72.
It's that small portion of (73/72 - 1) = 1/72 that gives you the headache.
This is why I'm sticking by my answer.
Join the discussion

by sacx » Tue Mar 10, 2009 4:28 am
it is easier to convert it into decimals and then solve

x < 8/9 ~0.888
y < 1/8 ~0.125

Case I: now lets suppose x = 0.887 and y = 0.124

x +y = 1.011 >1

Case I: now lets suppose x = 0.6 and y = 0.1

x +y = 0.7 <1

Hence the answer should be E
SACX
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Tue Oct 04, 2011 6:15 am
asht wrote:Is x + y < 1 ?

1. x < 8/9
2. y < 1/8

I answered C, but unfortunately it was shown as wrong. The given OA answer didn't make any sense to me. Pls help!

OA is E
Lets plug in values,

1) X should be 0.888888888888887 or lesser
2) Y should be 0.1025 or lesser

1+2) x+y = 1.013, which is greater than 1 (max value)
1+2) x+y = 0.001+0.001 = 0.002, which is less than 1

So insufficient!

IMO:E
Join the discussion