BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is |x|<1?

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 146
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 5:41 am
Thanked: 3 times
by apoorva.srivastva » Wed May 20, 2009 10:16 pm
Is |x|<1?

1.) |x+1| = 2 |x-1|
2.) |x-3| not equal to 3

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I woul like to know that if there is mod sign on both the sides of the linear equation ....can we get rid of the mod and slove the equation as a normal linear equation as in statement 1

|x + 1| = 2|x - 1|

so by my logic can we get rid of the mod sign

(x+1) = 2(x-1)

and slove further.....

ALSO PLEASE SUGGEST ME ANY PREP MATERIAL FOR MODULUS AND INEQUALITIES
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 682
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 2:40 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 32 times

Re: Is |x|<1?

by Vemuri » Wed May 20, 2009 10:54 pm
Is the OA A?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 146
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 5:41 am
Thanked: 3 times

by apoorva.srivastva » Wed May 20, 2009 11:31 pm
NO the OA is not A
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 682
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 2:40 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 32 times

Re: Is |x|<1?

by Vemuri » Thu May 21, 2009 2:31 am
Ok, let me put down my logic. I am not sure I understand why A is not the right answer.

The question is basically asking if -1<x<1, i.e. x is in between -1 & 1, i.e. -0.99....0.....0.99

Stmt1: |x+1| = 2 |x-1| can be reduced to either:
x+1 = 2x-2 ==> x=3
or
-x-1=-2x+2 ==> x=3
So, basically this statement is saying that x=3. So, we can answer the question with a definite NO. Sufficient.

Stmt2: |x-3| not equal to 3. Lets take an example. If |x-3|=6, then x=9 or x=-3. If |x-3|=2.9, then x=5.9 or 0.1. So, this statement is not sufficient to answer the question.

Am I missing something here?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 322
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 3:56 pm
Thanked: 24 times
GMAT Score:710

by mike22629 » Thu May 21, 2009 9:30 am
Use number line, the IMO is C.

l = absolute value sign

lx-(-1)l = 2lx-1l

Hence the distance between x and -1 is twice the distance between x and 1. Use number line to see how we can satisfy this.

1st possibility:

-----(-1)-----0---(x=1/3)----1----

2nd possibility

-----(-1)-----0----------------1--------(x=3)

In both situations, the distance between x and -1, and x and 1 is equal

Statement 2)

x does not equal 3, hence x = 1/3

IMO C
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 322
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 3:56 pm
Thanked: 24 times
GMAT Score:710

by mike22629 » Thu May 21, 2009 9:34 am
Actually, misread question. IMO E.

2nd statement says lx-3l not equal to 3, which means its not equal to 6 or 0,

so x could be 1/3 or 3

I go with E.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 322
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 3:56 pm
Thanked: 24 times
GMAT Score:710

by mike22629 » Fri May 22, 2009 5:04 am
What is OA?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 9:36 am
Location: mumbai

by jack5047 » Fri May 22, 2009 11:07 am
A is the right answer..
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 10:24 am

by sanjay_dce » Fri May 22, 2009 11:17 am
E is the ans
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 158
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 8:47 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 23 times
GMAT Score:660

by DeepakR » Fri May 22, 2009 7:38 pm
#1. |x+1| = 2 |x-1|
The ideal way would be to identify the critical points of the 2 absolute values and formulate the boundaries.

In this case x=-1 and x=1 are the boundaries. We have to consider the following cases:

When x<-1 then -(x+1)=-2(x-1) hence x=3.
When -1<x<1 then (x+1)=-2(x-1) hence x=1/3
When x>1 then (x+1)=2(x-1) hence x=3

So we have x=3 and x=1/3 as solutions. Hence we cannot conclusively say if x lies between 1 and -1.

#2. I think the question has to be lx - 3l &#8800; 0 in that case x<>3 so B insufficient.

Combining #1 and #2 we can conclusively say that x=1/3 and hence C.) is the answer.

If the question is correct |x-3| not equal to 3 then x<>6 or x<>0. Could be anything and hence E.)

- Deepak
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 146
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 5:41 am
Thanked: 3 times

by apoorva.srivastva » Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:16 pm
OA is E
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 3:55 pm
Thanked: 11 times
GMAT Score:740

by Domnu » Thu Jun 25, 2009 1:30 pm
The answer is definitely E. Here's why:

1) Solving, we get x = 1/3 or 3. This isn't decisive.
2) Solving, we get x not equal to 0 and x not equal to 6. Not decisive either.

Combining, we get x = 1/3 or 3 (and x not equal to 0 and x not equal to 6), but this second part is redundant. Still indecisive. So, we are at E.
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1