BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is |x|< 1? (1) |x + 1| = 2|x - 1| (2) |x - 3| ≠ 0

Expert replies
by ankurshobhit » Tue Jun 01, 2010 11:00 am
Is |x|< 1?
1) |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|
(2) |x - 3| ≠ 0
A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

I guess the answer should be A
1) If X =+ve
X+1=2X-2; x=3
If X=-ve
-X+1=-2X-2; x=1
Both the cases X>1
so we can answer the question.
(1) is sufficient
2) does not make any sense as |x-3| can be any value
Kindly help me in finding out the correct answer [/img][/i]
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by selango » Tue Jun 01, 2010 11:15 am
From stmt1,

If X =+ve

X+1=2X-2; x=3

If X=-ve

The equation cannot be solved.[Its confusing here]

IMO A is insufficient

From stmt2 |x-3| ≠ 0

-->x cannot be equal to 3.

x can be any value like -1,0,2 except 3.

If x=0,|X|<1

If x=2,|x|>1

So B is insufficient


Answer is E
Last edited by selango on Tue Jun 01, 2010 11:33 am, edited 2 times in total.
Join the discussion

by jube » Tue Jun 01, 2010 11:29 am
Statement 1:

1) -1< x < 1, then:
x+1 = -2x+2 or x=1/3

2) If x <- 1, then
-x-1 = -2x+2 or x=3

3) If x>1, then
x+1= 2x-2 or x=3

- insufficient


Statement 2: insufficient

Statement 1 & 2 - sufficient since it rules out x < -1 & x >1

Hence, C

---
edited to correct careless errors
Last edited by jube on Tue Jun 01, 2010 9:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by clock60 » Tue Jun 01, 2010 12:51 pm
my small thinking
is -1<x<1 ??
(1) |x+1|=2|x-1| here two way are possible one to square both parts and solving quadratic equation, and the second to open module step by step
_________ -1_________1 __________

|x+1|={(x+1) if x>-1. or -(x+1) if x<-1}

|x+1|={(x-1) if x>1, or -(x-1) if x<1}

the first interval
_________ -1, or x<-1

-(x+1)=-2(x-1)
x=3 but 3 does not fit in intrval x<-1
so we have no roots here

the second interval
(-1,1)

(x+1)=-2(x-1)
x=1/3 it can be root of given equation

the last interval x>1

x-3=2(x-1)
x=3 also can be root
so we have 2 answers x=3 not belong to (-1,1)
and 1/3 belong to (-1,1)
1st st insufficient

(2) x=/=3 insufficient

both 2st put off 3 as answer so we left with 1/3 within (-1,1)
the answer C
Join the discussion

by jube » Wed Jun 02, 2010 12:23 am
btw not sure if it would help but Manhattan GMAT's tutorial on absolute values really helped me in solving this one.

https://www.manhattangmat.com/tutorials/ ... -value.cfm
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:11 am
clock60 wrote:my small thinking
is -1<x<1 ??
(1) |x+1|=2|x-1| here two way are possible one to square both parts and solving quadratic equation, and the second to open module step by step
_________ -1_________1 __________

|x+1|={(x+1) if x>-1. or -(x+1) if x<-1}

|x+1|={(x-1) if x>1, or -(x-1) if x<1}

the first interval
_________ -1, or x<-1

-(x+1)=-2(x-1)
x=3 but 3 does not fit in intrval x<-1
so we have no roots here

the second interval
(-1,1)

(x+1)=-2(x-1)
x=1/3 it can be root of given equation

the last interval x>1

x-3=2(x-1)
x=3 also can be root
so we have 2 answers x=3 not belong to (-1,1)
and 1/3 belong to (-1,1)
1st st insufficient

(2) x=/=3 insufficient

both 2st put off 3 as answer so we left with 1/3 within (-1,1)
the answer C


ST 1 :1) |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|

case 1 :

(x+1) = 2( x-1)

x +1 = 2x-2

x = 3

case 2 :

-(x+1) = -2(x-1)

-x-1 = -2x+2

x=3

case 3 :

-(x+1) = 2(x-1)

-x-1 = 2x-2

-3x= -1

x=1/3

case 4:

(x+1)= -2(x-1)
x+1 = -2x +2

3x =1

x= 1/3


We have 2 values x = 3 or x = 1/3. Inconsistent as 3 > 1 & 1/3 <1

Insufficient

St 2:

|x - 3| Not equal to 0

So it means X is not equal to three

Still X can be any value. Say X can be 10 or 0 or 1. Inconsistent. SO insufficient

Now combining 2 statements:

we have X is NOT equal to 3 so we have x = 1/3 only

1/3 < 1. YES

Pick C..Move on !!
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Thu Jun 03, 2010 2:16 am
@gmatmachoman: in analyzing (1), you tested 2 too many cases! Because x=y and -x=-y are identical equations, your cases 1 and 2 are identical. Because x=-y and -x=y are identical equations, your cases 3 and 4 are identical.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sat Jun 26, 2010 10:23 pm
Testluv wrote:@gmatmachoman: in analyzing (1), you tested 2 too many cases! Because x=y and -x=-y are identical equations, your cases 1 and 2 are identical. Because x=-y and -x=y are identical equations, your cases 3 and 4 are identical.

Yeah agreed!! Thx for that!! I am all worried about probabilities..somebody on this earth plz plz help me out in some way!!
Join the discussion