BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

is vs are

Expert replies
by nasa » Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:06 am
Which one of the following is correct.
1) The doctrine applies in Canada, where there is a federal law and a provincial law.
2) The doctrine applies in Canada, where there are a federal law and a provincial law.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by S0laris » Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:56 am
2 -correct, bc there is "and" used. It makes verb plural, even if connects singular subjects. If it dificult to comprehend try to reverse the words:

a federal law and a provincial law (is/are).... ?
we are the champions !
Join the discussion

by blackarrow » Sun Mar 29, 2009 12:35 pm
My choice is A

Where there is a federal law and a provincial law

read this parallel sentence again...where there is a federal law ...where there is a provincial law

OA please
Its better to burn out than to fade away
Join the discussion

by nasa » Sun Mar 29, 2009 2:32 pm
Barron's Official answer is B - which I am against.
Reason why I am against:
Alternate forms where plural verb is applicable.
1) Fed and Prov laws are required in a place for the doctrine to be applicable.

2) Canada should have fed and prov laws for the doctrine to be appicable.
- have is needed for conveying the subjunctive mode and not because fed and prov forms a plural verb

Alternate forms where singular verb is applicable.
3) The doctrine applies in Canada because the country has both fed and prov law.

4) The doctrine applies in Canada where there is fed law and prov law.
"where" modifies "canada". If you were to form a sentence without the modifier where, you will land up in a sentence similar to (3) above.
Join the discussion

by TedCornell » Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:19 am
nasa wrote:Barron's Official answer is B - which I am against.
Reason why I am against:
Alternate forms where plural verb is applicable.
1) Fed and Prov laws are required in a place for the doctrine to be applicable.

2) Canada should have fed and prov laws for the doctrine to be appicable.
- have is needed for conveying the subjunctive mode and not because fed and prov forms a plural verb

Alternate forms where singular verb is applicable.
3) The doctrine applies in Canada because the country has both fed and prov law.

4) The doctrine applies in Canada where there is fed law and prov law.
"where" modifies "canada". If you were to form a sentence without the modifier where, you will land up in a sentence similar to (3) above.
Your explanation is confusing (to me) because you seem to talk of 4 sentences whereas your original posting has only 2 sentences. You also write about the subjunctive whereas the sentences you originally posted don't deal with the subjunctive.

As far as your original posting is concerned, SOlaris is 100% correct.

There are a federal law and a provinsial law.
SOlaris wrote:2 -correct, bc there is "and" used. It makes verb plural, even if connects singular subjects. If it dificult to comprehend try to reverse the words:

a federal law and a provincial law (is/are).... ?
Join the discussion

by Nailya » Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:32 am
2 option is the correct one. If it's confusing try to reverse the order :

The doctrine applies in Canada, where there are a federal law and a provincial law. - federal law and provincial law are in Canada...

Besides, 'and' connecting 2 subjects always requires plural verb form.
GMATPrep1 - 550
GMAT Prep2 - 590
MGMAT1 - 620
MGMAT2 - 640
MGMAT3 - 660
MGMAT4 - 680
MGMAT5 - 690
GMATPrep1 - 690
MGMAT6 - 720
Join the discussion

by nasa » Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:20 pm
Agreed.
To say
"I like shops, where there are books"
is correct than to say
"I like shops, where there is books"

In a similar tone, option B is right
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1