Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Is this the right mindset for this problem?

Expert replies
by kellogs4toniee » Sat Jan 21, 2012 11:54 am
Q: A certain university will select 1 of 7 candidates eligible to fill a position in the mathematics department and 2 of 10 candidates eligible to fill 2 identical positions in the computer science department. If none of the candidates is eligible for a position in both departments, how many different sets of 3 candidates are there to fill the 3 positions?

A. 42
B. 70
C. 140
D. 165
E. 315

The book gave an explanation that I only understood about 80%. This is how I solved the question: There are two positions. First position has 7C1 combinations (7). Second position has 10C2 combinations (45). Then you multiply 7 and 45 to get 315 total combinations of both positions.

That got me the right answer. Is that the right way and mindset I should be doing these type of problems? Is there something that I missed?

Thanks,

Tony
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by LalaB » Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:12 pm
I did it in the same way as u did.
my question is what that book offers to do? please show us how it is solved in the book.
Join the discussion

by kellogs4toniee » Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:21 pm
LalaB wrote:I did it in the same way as u did.
my question is what that book offers to do? please show us how it is solved in the book.
The part in the book that I did not fully understand says this:

To fill the positions in the computer science department, any one of the 10 eligible candidates can be chosen for the first position and any of the remaining 9 can be chosen for the second, making 10x9 = 90 sets of 2 candidates to fill the computer science position. But, this number includes the set in which candidate A was chosen to fill the first position and B was chosen to fill the second as well as the set in which B was chosen for the first, and A was chosen for the second. Therefore, there are 90/2 = 45 sets of 2 candidates.

After re-reading it, I think I understand now. The bolded part is basically defining the reason why we are using combinations instead of permutations. The order does not matter in the question, and the book tried explaining that through the words and terms of the problem.
Join the discussion

by LalaB » Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:29 pm
yep, partially the same logic is used. u can write 10C2 (10!/2!*8!=10*9/2). or 10*9/2 (the method used in the book) . everything is clear now ;)
Join the discussion