BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

is the point (m, n) farther

Expert replies
by sanju09 » Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:40 am
In the rectangular coordinate system, is the point (m, n) farther from the origin than point (p, q)?
(1) mn − pq = 12
(2) p + q = 21.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Anurag@Gurome » Fri Mar 02, 2012 4:33 am
sanju09 wrote:In the rectangular coordinate system, is the point (m, n) farther from the origin than point (p, q)?
(1) mn − pq = 12
(2) p + q = 21.
(1) mn − pq = 12
If p = 10, q = 0, m = 4, n = 3, then distance between (4, 3) and (0, 0) = √(4² + 3²) = 5 and distance between (10, 0) and (0, 0) = √(10² + 0²) = 10. Here, point (p, q) is farther from the origin than point (m, n).
If p = 1, q = 1, m = 1, n = 13, then distance between (1, 13) and (0, 0) = √(1² + 13²) = √170 and distance between (1, 1) and (0, 0) = √(1² + 1²) = √2. Here, point (m, n) is farther from the origin than point (p, q).
No definite answer; NOT sufficient.

(2) p + q = 21
If p = 21, q = 0, m = 4, n = 3, then distance between (4, 3) and (0, 0) = √(4² + 3²) = 5 and distance between (21, 0) and (0, 0) = √(21² + 0²) = 21. Here, point (p, q) is farther from the origin than point (m, n).
If p = 18, q = 3, m = 33, n = 2, then distance between (33, 2) and (0, 0) = √(33² + 2²) = √1093 and distance between (18, 3) and (0, 0) = √(18² + 3²) = √333. Here, point (m, n) is farther from the origin than point (p, q).
No definite answer; NOT sufficient.

Combining (1) and (2), we can take the same examples as in statement 2; again NOT sufficient.

The correct answer is E.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by krusta80 » Fri Mar 02, 2012 6:08 am
sanju09 wrote:In the rectangular coordinate system, is the point (m, n) farther from the origin than point (p, q)?
(1) mn − pq = 12
(2) p + q = 21.
Distance of (m,n) to the origin = sqrt(m^2+n^2)
Distance of (p,q) to the origin = sqrt(p^2+q^2)

Rephrasing the question: sqrt(m^2+n^2) > sqrt(p^2+q^2)?

It looks like this is yet another well-hidden application of FOIL. Let's yet again re-write the question.

sqrt[(m+n)^2 - 2mn] > sqrt[(p+q)^2 - 2pq]?

From (1) we have mn - pq = 12

mn = pq+12

Let's plug-in values for mn and pq -> nm = 13 and pq = 1

sqrt[(m+n)^2 - 26] > sqrt[(p+q)^2 - 1]?

Using values for m and n that are far apart (multiplicative inverses) and values for p and q that are equal makes this true, while the opposite makes it false. Note that there is no limit to how big we can make any one variable, since there is always an inverse value that can set mn or pq equal to 13 or 1, respectfully.


From Part (2) we have p+q = 21

Taken alone, this tells us nothing about m and n, so it must be INSUFFICIENT

(1) and (2) Together

This may be enough to solve now...

sqrt[(m+n)^2 - 2mn] > sqrt[(p+q)^2 - 2pq]?

sqrt[(m+n)^2 - 2(pq+12)] > sqrt(21^2 - 2pq)

sqrt[(m+n)^2 - 2pq - 24)] > sqrt(21^2 - 2pq)

Squaring both sides...

(m+n)^2 - 2pq - 24 > 21^2 - 2pq?
(m+n)^2 > 21^2 + 24?

We still have two unknowns here, so INSUFFICIENT

E
Join the discussion