BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

is samuel a bad fisherman?

Expert replies
by chaya009 » Thu Feb 11, 2010 9:14 pm
Samuel is obviously a bad fisherman. During the past season, in which he and the five members of his team spent four months on a boat together off Dutch Harbor, AK, he caught fewer fish than any of his teammates.
Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument above?

A) Two seasons ago, Samuel fished on another boat off Dutch Harbor and caught more fish than any other member of that boat
B) Before becoming a fisherman, Samuel piloted a fishing boat whose members regularly caught record numbers of fish.
C) While fishing this past season, Samuel fell sick for a week and did not catch any fish during this time.
D) Unlike the other fishermen on his boat, at the order of the captain, Samuel fished this past season with experimental bait.
E) Amongst the fishing community in Dutch Harbor, Samuel has a reputation for being an especially bad fisherman

OA later
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by thephoenix » Thu Feb 11, 2010 9:22 pm
chaya009 wrote:Samuel is obviously a bad fisherman. During the past season, in which he and the five members of his team spent four months on a boat together off Dutch Harbor, AK, he caught fewer fish than any of his teammates.
Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument above?

A) Two seasons ago, Samuel fished on another boat off Dutch Harbor and caught more fish than any other member of that boat
B) Before becoming a fisherman, Samuel piloted a fishing boat whose members regularly caught record numbers of fish.
C) While fishing this past season, Samuel fell sick for a week and did not catch any fish during this time.
D) Unlike the other fishermen on his boat, at the order of the captain, Samuel fished this past season with experimental bait.
E) Amongst the fishing community in Dutch Harbor, Samuel has a reputation for being an especially bad fisherman

OA later
IMO D
conclusion : Samuel is obviously a bad fisherman

reason:he caught fewer fish than any of his teammates,During the past season

to weaken this we need to give another valid reason for his poor performance

D says he was given experimental bait ( for which no bdy knows wat will be the outcome) ; hence all other had an upper hand over samuel , so concluding samuel is bad fisherman is unfair ,hence it weakens the argument
Join the discussion

by sars72 » Thu Feb 11, 2010 9:42 pm
A) Two seasons ago, Samuel fished on another boat off Dutch Harbor and caught more fish than any other member of that boat
another boat and is compared to other members (who could be bad or good). doesn't tell us anything. Eliminated!
B) Before becoming a fisherman, Samuel piloted a fishing boat whose members regularly caught record numbers of fish.
piloted a fishing boat. Out of scope. Eliminated!
C) While fishing this past season, Samuel fell sick for a week and did not catch any fish during this time.
hmm... he was sick and didn't catch any fish for a week. The conclusin that "he is a bad fisherman" is based on the fact that the caught fewer fish. So, this does weaken the argument.
D) Unlike the other fishermen on his boat, at the order of the captain, Samuel fished this past season with experimental bait.
Expirimental bait could have positive or negative results. So, while this does add some doubt, it doesn't have as strong a case as choice C.
E) Amongst the fishing community in Dutch Harbor, Samuel has a reputation for being an especially bad fisherman
amongst ppl in dutch harbour... reputation. All irrelevant. Eliminated!

So, IMO, answer is
C
Join the discussion

by chaya009 » Thu Feb 11, 2010 9:44 pm
The OA is D.
Join the discussion