BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is GMATPrep adaptive?

Expert replies
Source: — GMAT Strategy |

by crejoc » Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:50 pm
To my knowledge , yes it is adaptive. I have never heard anyone say any complaint about it. It is the best practice test available.
Join the discussion

by aim-wsc » Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:39 pm
Of course it's adaptive.
crejoc wrote:To my knowledge , yes it is adaptive. I have never heard anyone say any complaint about it. It is the best practice test available.
yeah agree with crejoc.
Join the discussion

by Sweetshel86 » Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:56 pm
How indicative is it of what you'll score on the real thing? Ive done princeton review prep class and my test is in a week...last few PR tests I got 610, 670, 640 and on GMATPrep test #1 710.
Join the discussion

by tkherrmann » Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:32 am
Single GMATPrep tests aren't simply the most reliable predictors of performance in general. It depends how you take the test. I've found that the average of multiple GMATPrep tests is a generally reliable predictor.

Also, I've heard LOTS of people say that test prep companies skew their score reports low so that when test day arrives, your resulting score makes it look like the company helped you improve. Of course, this effect probably varies from company to company.

Tim
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:09 pm
tkherrmann wrote: Also, I've heard LOTS of people say that test prep companies skew their score reports low so that when test day arrives, your resulting score makes it look like the company helped you improve. Of course, this effect probably varies from company to company.
It certainly varies from company to company, but there are a few reasons why companies have a commercial interest in producing test scores which are too low:

-if you get an 800 on their test, you're not going to think you need help, so you won't buy anything from them;

-if the company offers some kind of guarantee ('you'll improve by 150 points!') and that guarantee is based on a comparison between a score on a company test and your score on the real test, the company has a clear incentive to produce low scores on their test, so that they will not need to honor that guarantee as often.

Even companies which make an honest effort to produce reliable scores - and some do, certainly - run up against the difficulties of emulating the GMAT scoring algorithm. To do this well, you need to compile a lot of data on each test question, and only GMAC has a large enough test taking audience to do this successfully.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by tkherrmann » Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:46 pm
To Ian -- exactly what I was thinking. There are definitely multiple incentives. I just did n't want to make a blanket claim about all testing companies. :D

Basically, the best tests are GMATPrep, no matter how you cut it.

Tim
Join the discussion

by tkherrmann » Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:47 pm
To Ian -- exactly what I was thinking. There are definitely multiple incentives. I just did n't want to make a blanket claim about all testing companies. :D

Basically, the best tests are GMATPrep, no matter how you cut it.

Tim
Join the discussion