BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is 'fines' countable or uncountable ?

Expert replies
by yourshail123 » Sat Nov 03, 2012 8:55 am
The administration has increased the number of fines for mining safety violations as part of their campaign to protect miners.
A) has increased the number of fines for mining safety violations as part of their
B) have increased the number of fines for mining safety violations as part of their
C) has increased the number of fines for mining safety violations as part of its
D) has increased the amount of fines for mining safety violations as part of its
E) have increased the amount of fines for mining safety violations as part of their
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by gmatwar13 » Sat Nov 03, 2012 10:46 pm
D...

The administration is singular... B and E out..
A has their.. which dosn't refer back to administaration..
between C and D.... the number of fines... the amount of fine... In this context D is correct...
Join the discussion

by yourshail123 » Sun Nov 04, 2012 1:53 am
Exactly gmatwar13!! I think answer choice should be D.
Even I came up to answer choice between C and D, however I was setback when I saw the correct answer choice as C.

So, I put up this question to check whether the 'fines' are countable.

This is a MGMAT CAT question.
As per MGMAT lesson, I usually try to do it Manhattan way -
1) 1 dollar, 2 dollars, 3 dollars ...... etc. This works; dollar is countable.
2) 1 money, 2 money .. STOP. This does not work; money is uncountable.

Similarly the above rules applies to 'fines'. Can we say 1 fine, 2 fines, ...... etc. so as to conclude 'fines' as countable?
Join the discussion

by gmatwar13 » Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:31 am
oh got it.. between "amount of fines" and "number of fines".. i read d option as "amount of fine" but it is "amount of fines"

you wont say amount of "amount of proteins in egg" you would say "amount of protein in egg".. here we refer to protein as a whole which is uncountable... so protein is used not proteins
similarly you wont say "number of protein in egg" but you would say "number of proteins in egg".. here we refer to various kinds of proteins...so number of is used to show it is countable...

It all depends on context where it is used....nothing to do with plurality... "amount of fine" and "number of fines" both are correct... going by this c is correct..
Join the discussion

by yourshail123 » Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:42 am
Ok. Indeed 'amount of fines' is incorrect and we can take it correct only if it is 'amount of fine'.
But, considering the logic of the sentence wouldn't it be the amount of fine that has increased and not the number?

In this context, grammatically Choice D is also eliminated and leaves the best answer choice C only.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1