BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is D wrong?

Expert replies
by kulksnikhil » Sat Nov 11, 2006 2:46 am
It has been a commonplace in medical literature that the ingestion of drug L,, in combination with the application of lotion M, causes appearance of adverse reaction O. Recently however doubts have been cast on the role of lotion M in the appearance of adverse reaction O.

Which one of following research findings could most reasonably have created the doubts referred to above?

A. The appearance of adverse reaction O following the ingestion of drug L and the application of lotion M

B. The absense of adverse reaction O following the ingestion of drug L and the application of lotion M

C. The ingestion of drug L and the appearance of adverse reaction O in the absense of lotion M

D. The absense of adverse reaction O following the ingestion of drug L without the application of lotion M

E. The disappearance of adverse reaction O following the ingestion of drug L and the application of lotion M
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by rajs.kumar » Sat Nov 11, 2006 7:17 am
I would go for C.

Reasoning: L and M (ingestion of L and application of M) combine together to causes adverse effect O. If doubts came up on the role of M that basically means L does not need M to cause the effect O. This is captured in C.

On the other hand, the assence of effect O in D could be because L and M did not combine.

C. The ingestion of drug L and the appearance of adverse reaction O in the absense of lotion M

D. The absense of adverse reaction O following the ingestion of drug L without the application of lotion M
Join the discussion

by kulksnikhil » Sat Nov 11, 2006 7:37 am
rajs.kumar wrote:I would go for C.

Reasoning: L and M (ingestion of L and application of M) combine together to causes adverse effect O. If doubts came up on the role of M that basically means L does not need M to cause the effect O. This is captured in C.

On the other hand, the assence of effect O in D could be because L and M did not combine.

C. The ingestion of drug L and the appearance of adverse reaction O in the absense of lotion M

D. The absense of adverse reaction O following the ingestion of drug L without the application of lotion M
oops I missed the part that.. 'the adverse effect is due to combination of the two'... thanks for that explanation, but...

the part that confused me (as u have captured in your post) is... the statement.. "recently doubts have been cast on the role played by lotion M".... doesn't "doubt" mean "suspecting" M of being the culprit ?
Join the discussion

by rajs.kumar » Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:34 pm
kulksnikhil wrote:
oops I missed the part that.. 'the adverse effect is due to combination of the two'... thanks for that explanation, but...

the part that confused me (as u have captured in your post) is... the statement.. "recently doubts have been cast on the role played by lotion M".... doesn't "doubt" mean "suspecting" M of being the culprit ?
recently doubts have been cast => changes or modifies role

Added to that "role of M for the appearance of O" earlier in the question stem it was stated L and M combined together to cause the effect O. Later doubts have raised meaning M may not be involved in the process. Did I explain it??
Join the discussion

by kulksnikhil » Mon Nov 13, 2006 1:03 am
rajs.kumar wrote:
kulksnikhil wrote:
oops I missed the part that.. 'the adverse effect is due to combination of the two'... thanks for that explanation, but...

the part that confused me (as u have captured in your post) is... the statement.. "recently doubts have been cast on the role played by lotion M".... doesn't "doubt" mean "suspecting" M of being the culprit ?
recently doubts have been cast => changes or modifies role

Added to that "role of M for the appearance of O" earlier in the question stem it was stated L and M combined together to cause the effect O. Later doubts have raised meaning M may not be involved in the process. Did I explain it??
Thanks for the explaination raj.. it is pretty clear... I will have to be careful next time... "doubt" would mean, deviation from expectation, whether it positive deviation or negative deviation.
Join the discussion

by Cybermusings » Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:12 am
I would go for Option C...Appearence of an adverse reaction O, after ingestion of the drug but the absence of the Lotion M...goes on to prove that Lotion M has nothing to do with the reaction...It might just happen because of ingestion of L
Join the discussion

by khanshainur » Sat Apr 16, 2016 6:45 am
I also would go with option C.I think it is the most logical one.
Join the discussion