BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is -4 in S? from DS 1000 series

Expert replies
by mehravikas » Sat May 31, 2008 5:47 pm
S is a set of integers such that,

1. If a is in s, then -a is in S.
2. If each of a and b is in S, then ab is in S.

Given that -

1. 1 is in S
2. 2 is in S

Is -4 in S?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by jasonc » Sat May 31, 2008 6:17 pm
answer should be b.

given:
S:{a, -a, -a^2, +/-a^3, +/-a^4.....}
(if you dont' understand the above, read (-a) as b and it should make sense)

stem1: 1 is in S => S has at least 1 & -1
INSUFF

stem2: 2 is in S => S has at least 2, -2, -4, +/-2^n where n is any positive integer
SUFF
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Sat May 31, 2008 8:24 pm
jasonc wrote:answer should be b.

given:
S:{a, -a, -a^2, +/-a^3, +/-a^4.....}
(if you dont' understand the above, read (-a) as b and it should make sense)

stem1: 1 is in S => S has at least 1 & -1
INSUFF

stem2: 2 is in S => S has at least 2, -2, -4, +/-2^n where n is any positive integer
SUFF
Your answer is correct, but I am still not able to understand the way you have made a series of values in the set. From what I understood, the set should be something like S = {a, -a, b, ab}

Can you explain further, please?
Join the discussion

by jasonc » Sat May 31, 2008 9:37 pm
I think the point you may be missing is that the original 2 statements apply to ALL elements of S. Meaning that if 'a' and '-a' are in the set, then 'ab', or in this case 'a' & '-a', must also be in the set.

like I hinted at in my original post, substitue -a in for b.
I beat the GMAT! 760 (Q49/V44)
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Sun Jun 01, 2008 12:09 am
jasonc wrote:I think the point you may be missing is that the original 2 statements apply to ALL elements of S. Meaning that if 'a' and '-a' are in the set, then 'ab', or in this case 'a' & '-a', must also be in the set.

like I hinted at in my original post, substitue -a in for b.
Getting it now :-))

Thanks,

Vikas
Join the discussion

by airan » Sun Jun 01, 2008 12:28 am
JasonC,
How can we assume -a=b, b can be something else also.
For example:
if a=2, b=1 that means, -2 is also in set but how b=-2 ?

I think it is based on assumption that b=-a, otherwise the answer should be E. Can u pls try to explain it once more(why assume b=-a)
Thanks
Airan
Join the discussion

by zacharyz » Tue Jun 03, 2008 7:17 am
From (2), you know that S contains at least {2}. There is no other guarantee that anything else is in the set... but let's look at the rules:

i) says that if a is in the set, then -a is in the set.
Now you know that -2 is also in the set.

ii) says that if a and b are in the set, then a*b are in the set.
We know that S at least contains {2, -2} now we have an a and a b. In this case, a = 2 and b = -2. Now you know that a*b is in the set, by definition, and therefore -4 is in the set.

So (B) is sufficient.

Other observations, S is going to become an infinite set in 2 as S becomes {2, -2, -4, 4, 8, -8, 16, etc...}

Statement 1 only guaranteed that S is {1, -1}... and then unknowns

Just remember that a and b are not specific numbers, but any of two different variables.
Join the discussion