BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Irish Monks

Expert replies
by rish » Fri Aug 28, 2009 7:45 pm
Some archeologists hypothesize that Irish monks were the first Europeans to reach North America, roughly 100 years before the Vikings. The Irish monks, it is believed, crossed the Atlantic in boats constructed primarily of leather, in order to find isolation and solitude, and some of them might have settled with the Native Americans. Unfortunately, no physical evidence has been found to support this theory.

Which of the following, if true, best supports the hypothesis of these archeologists, taking into account the paucity of physical evidence?

A Archeologists now believe that the Vikings went to North America 50 years earlier than had been previously thought.
B Viking longboats were much faster and sturdier than Irish leather-bound boats.
C Leather tends to rot after only a couple of decades.
D Anthropologists have found no evidence of any Irish words or expressions in the languages of modern-day North America.
E Concrete, physical evidence of Viking settlements have been discovered only in Newfoundland, Canada.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by crackgmat007 » Fri Aug 28, 2009 9:03 pm
C seems to support by stating that leather boats, which were used by monks, do not rot for 2 decades.
Join the discussion

by iwill » Fri Aug 28, 2009 9:37 pm
yeah.. C

Please post the OA along with the questions

Thanks,
V
Join the discussion

by iwill » Fri Aug 28, 2009 9:38 pm
yeah.. C

Please post the OA along with the questions

Thanks,
V
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Fri Aug 28, 2009 10:24 pm
IMO - C

Supports the hypothesis of these archeologists...
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Fri Aug 28, 2009 10:52 pm
IMO A
Join the discussion

by rish » Sat Aug 29, 2009 5:53 am
OA is C. Can somebody please explain ?
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sat Aug 29, 2009 6:14 am
Guys,I am not able to decipher why C holds strong!!
Post ur explanations.
Today has been very unpleasant as I have opted only wrong answers... :( :( :(

statistics is something like 15 correct of 40...may be my temperament is very bad!!!
Join the discussion

Re: Irish Monks

by crackgmat007 » Sun Aug 30, 2009 8:04 pm
Argument is based on a premise that Irish monks crossed the Atlantic in boats constructed primarily of leather.

C strenghtens the premise by stating that travelling in leather boats is possible.

HTH.
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Sun Aug 30, 2009 9:27 pm
this is hypothesis -from-evidence argurment which is common in OG 11

from an evidence, hypothesis is offerd. find new evidence which sthenthen or wheaken the hypothesis

we need to find choice which "tip the scale toward believing conclusion" as kaplan book said.

because there is no physical evidence, the C will increase the believing and is correct

any comment, pls, speak out.
Join the discussion

Explains lack of physical evidence

by pd0483 » Sun Aug 30, 2009 9:29 pm
IMO C because it strengthens the argument. It helps in explaining the lack of physical evidence.
Join the discussion

by viju9162 » Mon Aug 31, 2009 2:42 am
From POE, C stands the best... the other answers don't really match as the answer
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

by heyabhi » Mon Aug 31, 2009 2:36 pm
The leather boats that these monks used could have been used as an evidence of there presence/journey to america. Since the evidence rots so does any evidence of the monks coming to america on these boats.
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Tue Sep 01, 2009 11:02 pm
gmatmachoman wrote:Guys,I am not able to decipher why C holds strong!!
Post ur explanations.
Today has been very unpleasant as I have opted only wrong answers... :( :( :(

statistics is something like 15 correct of 40...may be my temperament is very bad!!!
Really frustrating. No matter how much I study and practice i still make stupid mistakes :( :(
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Tue Sep 01, 2009 11:35 pm
Do you mind if I ask about the source of this question?

Is it from Kaplan ?
Join the discussion