BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Irish Monks

Expert replies
by rish » Fri Aug 28, 2009 7:45 pm
Some archeologists hypothesize that Irish monks were the first Europeans to reach North America, roughly 100 years before the Vikings. The Irish monks, it is believed, crossed the Atlantic in boats constructed primarily of leather, in order to find isolation and solitude, and some of them might have settled with the Native Americans. Unfortunately, no physical evidence has been found to support this theory.

Which of the following, if true, best supports the hypothesis of these archeologists, taking into account the paucity of physical evidence?

A Archeologists now believe that the Vikings went to North America 50 years earlier than had been previously thought.
B Viking longboats were much faster and sturdier than Irish leather-bound boats.
C Leather tends to rot after only a couple of decades.
D Anthropologists have found no evidence of any Irish words or expressions in the languages of modern-day North America.
E Concrete, physical evidence of Viking settlements have been discovered only in Newfoundland, Canada.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by crackgmat007 » Fri Aug 28, 2009 9:03 pm
C seems to support by stating that leather boats, which were used by monks, do not rot for 2 decades.
Join the discussion

by iwill » Fri Aug 28, 2009 9:37 pm
yeah.. C

Please post the OA along with the questions

Thanks,
V
Join the discussion

by iwill » Fri Aug 28, 2009 9:38 pm
yeah.. C

Please post the OA along with the questions

Thanks,
V
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Fri Aug 28, 2009 10:24 pm
IMO - C

Supports the hypothesis of these archeologists...
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Fri Aug 28, 2009 10:52 pm
IMO A
Join the discussion

by rish » Sat Aug 29, 2009 5:53 am
OA is C. Can somebody please explain ?
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sat Aug 29, 2009 6:14 am
Guys,I am not able to decipher why C holds strong!!
Post ur explanations.
Today has been very unpleasant as I have opted only wrong answers... :( :( :(

statistics is something like 15 correct of 40...may be my temperament is very bad!!!
Join the discussion

Re: Irish Monks

by crackgmat007 » Sun Aug 30, 2009 8:04 pm
Argument is based on a premise that Irish monks crossed the Atlantic in boats constructed primarily of leather.

C strenghtens the premise by stating that travelling in leather boats is possible.

HTH.
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Sun Aug 30, 2009 9:27 pm
this is hypothesis -from-evidence argurment which is common in OG 11

from an evidence, hypothesis is offerd. find new evidence which sthenthen or wheaken the hypothesis

we need to find choice which "tip the scale toward believing conclusion" as kaplan book said.

because there is no physical evidence, the C will increase the believing and is correct

any comment, pls, speak out.
Join the discussion

Explains lack of physical evidence

by pd0483 » Sun Aug 30, 2009 9:29 pm
IMO C because it strengthens the argument. It helps in explaining the lack of physical evidence.
Join the discussion

by viju9162 » Mon Aug 31, 2009 2:42 am
From POE, C stands the best... the other answers don't really match as the answer
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

by heyabhi » Mon Aug 31, 2009 2:36 pm
The leather boats that these monks used could have been used as an evidence of there presence/journey to america. Since the evidence rots so does any evidence of the monks coming to america on these boats.
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Tue Sep 01, 2009 11:02 pm
gmatmachoman wrote:Guys,I am not able to decipher why C holds strong!!
Post ur explanations.
Today has been very unpleasant as I have opted only wrong answers... :( :( :(

statistics is something like 15 correct of 40...may be my temperament is very bad!!!
Really frustrating. No matter how much I study and practice i still make stupid mistakes :( :(
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Tue Sep 01, 2009 11:35 pm
Do you mind if I ask about the source of this question?

Is it from Kaplan ?
Join the discussion