BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Invariant brand names

Expert replies
by Deepthi Subbu » Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:06 am
Products sold under a brand name used to command premium prices because, in general, they were superior to
nonbrand rival products. Technical expertise in product development has become so widespread, however, that
special quality advantages are very hard to obtain these days and even harder to maintain. As a consequence,
brand-name products generally neither offer higher quality nor sell at higher prices. Paradoxically, brand names
are a bigger marketing advantage than ever.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the paradox outlined above?

(A) Brand names are taken by consumers as a guarantee of getting a product as good as the best rival
products.

(B) Consumers recognize that the quality of products sold under invariant brand names can drift over time.

(C) In many acquisitions of one corporation by another, the acquiring corporation is interested more in
acquiring the right to use certain brand names than in acquiring existing production facilities.

(D) In the days when special quality advantages were easier to obtain than they are now, it was also easier to
get new brand names established.

(E) The advertising of a company's brand-name products is at times transferred to a new advertising agency,
especially when sales are declining.

When B has an equal chance , why is A the OA?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Ravish » Thu Dec 30, 2010 2:05 am
We eliminate B because we are not told that the quality of products under invariant brand names drift for the worst. If anything, we are told that they improve because they are playing catch up to the premium brands hence threatening their ability to command premium prices.

A is correct because the brand names, their image synonymous with high quality products, just make consumers feel a lot more secure about their purchase now that the premium brand is at the same price as that of the less recognized brand.

Here is a real world example:

A sony playstation 3 controller sells for 55 bucks but a third party has developed a similar controller which is a like for like replica of the sony controller and is selling it for 30 bucks. Tomorrow, if Sony lowered the price for the playstation 3 controller to 30 dollars, which one do you think consumers would buy? Most likely the Sony because the brand has just been always known for high quality products and people, psychologically, just believe that it will be more durable than it's unnamed counterpart.
Join the discussion

by Deepthi Subbu » Thu Dec 30, 2010 2:17 am
Thanks Ravish ,

I assumed that the quality of the invariant brand names can only reduce as time drifts , missed out the other case.

Thanks for the example , but I believe we shouldn't take the real life examples in to account at least for GMAT :)
Join the discussion

by richachampion » Thu Jun 16, 2016 4:38 am
(B) Consumers recognize that the quality of products sold under invariant brand names can drift over time.
Quality is not an issue, the paradox has clear assumption, based on facts, that quality and price while remain same brands have bigger marketing advantage than others. This is a very subtle distraction, but remember paradox is not about quality, but paradox has to be resolve with the fact that quality remains same then why is there competitive advantage. Option A addresses this concern.
Join the discussion