BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

International trade - Patria involved.

Expert replies
by bhumika.k.shah » Sun Feb 07, 2010 2:01 am
For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, a high degree of both international accord and ability to prevent goods from entering or leaving that country must be sustained. A total blockade of Patria's ports is necessary to an embargo, but such an action would be likely to cause international discord over the embargo. The claims above, if true, most strongly support which of the following conclusions?


(A) The balance of opinion is likely to favor Patria in
the event of a blockade.

(B) As long as international opinion is unanimously
against Patria, a trade embargo is likely to
succeed.

(C) A naval blockade of Patria's ports would ensure
that no goods enter or leave Patria.

(D) Any trade embargo against Patria would be likely
to fail at some time.

(E) For a blockade of Patria's ports to be
successful, international opinion must be
unanimous.

Whats wrong with E ?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by hrishi19884 » Sun Feb 07, 2010 2:16 am
bhumika.k.shah wrote:For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, a high degree of both international accord and ability to prevent goods from entering or leaving that country must be sustained. A total blockade of Patria's ports is necessary to an embargo, but such an action would be likely to cause international discord over the embargo. The claims above, if true, most strongly support which of the following conclusions?


(A) The balance of opinion is likely to favor Patria in
the event of a blockade.

(B) As long as international opinion is unanimously
against Patria, a trade embargo is likely to
succeed.

(C) A naval blockade of Patria's ports would ensure
that no goods enter or leave Patria.

(D) Any trade embargo against Patria would be likely
to fail at some time.

(E) For a blockade of Patria's ports to be
successful, international opinion must be
unanimous.

Whats wrong with E ?
My stake on D

The first line denotes the principle of "successful trade embargo" (this should be always considered true(Ahem!)

The claims suggest a problem that the blockade is necessary but there will be international dis-accord(questions asks to consider this as true)

Hence the only possibility is that the Patria port will not be successful against trade embargo.

Ans is D

E-- we cannot change the principle here and we have no right to do that(since its a principle)

For ex : Can we change Newton's laws? No . only Newton can change it.
Hrishi

"As you sow, so shall you reap"
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sun Feb 07, 2010 2:19 am
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Sun Feb 07, 2010 3:15 am
bhumika.k.shah wrote:For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, a high degree of both international accord and ability to prevent goods from entering or leaving that country must be sustained. A total blockade of Patria's ports is necessary to an embargo, but such an action would be likely to cause international discord over the embargo. The claims above, if true, most strongly support which of the following conclusions?


(A) The balance of opinion is likely to favor Patria in the event of a blockade.
we are not sure about this....there is intrnl disscord that is some favours and sme not .and rule is to have a blocade + intnl accord...nothing is mentioned about whether its 50-50 or more
eliminated
(B) As long as international opinion is unanimously against Patria, a trade embargo is likely to succeed.
for a trade embargo we need bth hence eliminated

(C) A naval blockade of Patria's ports would ensure that no goods enter or leave Patria.
may be or may be not wat if goods are entering thru air cargo
(D) Any trade embargo against Patria would be likely to fail at some time.
true
(E) For a blockade of Patria's ports to be successful, international opinion must be unanimous.
pasage mentions abt for a trade embargo we need blocade+intnl accord ; nthng abt blocade is mentioned in passage
eliminated
Join the discussion

by vijay_venky » Sun Feb 07, 2010 6:39 am
P1. successful trade embargo (sufficient) --> High degree of international accord + ability to prevent the flow of goods(necessary)

P2. Total blockade of port is necessary for an embargo. This adds to one more necessary condition to the premise 1.

P3. But blockade of ports causes international discord over the embargo (cause-effect scenario).

contra positive of P1,

No international accord or no ability to prevent the flow--> no successful trade embargo.

As for E, it was not mentioned in the stimulus whether the blockade of ports would be success or a failure depending up on the international accord. The blockade could well be successful even with out the accord. But what the successful blockade would cause has been mentioned in the premise 3.

And looking at this in a formulaic perspective, option E is trying to define a sufficient-necessary relation involving the blockade. This is not supported by the stimulus.

D rightly mentions the contra-positive of the P1+P2, because there is a dead lock over international accord and blockade of ports and because both are necessary for an embargo, the result(successful embargo) can never be achieved.

Hope this is understandable and does help...
Join the discussion

by bhumika.k.shah » Sun Feb 07, 2010 7:02 am
vijay_venky wrote: And looking at this in a formulaic perspective
What is that???
Join the discussion

by onedayi'll » Sun Feb 07, 2010 4:40 pm
+ 1 for D
Join the discussion

by rajnishgaur » Sun Mar 06, 2011 9:43 am
liked the reply
Join the discussion