Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Intended meaning??? MANHATTAN SC GUIDE

Expert replies
by rishijhawar » Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:21 pm
My question is related to understand ing the INTENDED MEANING of a sentence. Reason being, keeping aside the numerous grammar rules GMAT test, the correct answer hinges on expressing author’s intended meaning, something I find difficult to decipher in certain instances. Below is an example in this context:

#1: The court ruled that the plaintiff MUST pay full damages.
#2: The court ruled that the plaintiff SHOULD pay full damages.

Per MANHATTAN SC Guide (latest edition# pg 15), #2 is wrong because “The word should means "moral obligation''-something that a court cannot impose (I thought a court can certainly impose…..say additional taxes or restricting loud noise/late night parties beyond XX hours etc). On the other hand, the use of must in the first sentence indicates a legally binding obligation imposed upon the plaintiff. Thus, you should go with must, whether the original sentence used must or not.”

In the actual test, I would have selected #2 given my understanding that a Court of law can impose something given its status to pass laws etc. I don’t rule out #1 completely, but would go for #2.

Can someone please help me here? Appreciate expert advice as well.

BTW, those who haven’t seen, find the link which has David’s great explanation on INTENDED MEANING https://www.beatthegmat.com/the-truth-ab ... 76648.html
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by GmatKiss » Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:45 pm
Good question, would like to hear from experts!!
Join the discussion

by rishijhawar » Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:03 pm
Hi Guys, appreciate your inputs here. Thanks
rishijhawar wrote:My question is related to understand ing the INTENDED MEANING of a sentence. Reason being, keeping aside the numerous grammar rules GMAT test, the correct answer hinges on expressing author’s intended meaning, something I find difficult to decipher in certain instances. Below is an example in this context:

#1: The court ruled that the plaintiff MUST pay full damages.
#2: The court ruled that the plaintiff SHOULD pay full damages.

Per MANHATTAN SC Guide (latest edition# pg 15), #2 is wrong because “The word should means "moral obligation''-something that a court cannot impose (I thought a court can certainly impose…..say additional taxes or restricting loud noise/late night parties beyond XX hours etc). On the other hand, the use of must in the first sentence indicates a legally binding obligation imposed upon the plaintiff. Thus, you should go with must, whether the original sentence used must or not.”

In the actual test, I would have selected #2 given my understanding that a Court of law can impose something given its status to pass laws etc. I don’t rule out #1 completely, but would go for #2.

Can someone please help me here? Appreciate expert advice as well.

BTW, those who haven’t seen, find the link which has David’s great explanation on INTENDED MEANING https://www.beatthegmat.com/the-truth-ab ... 76648.html
Join the discussion

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Mon Apr 16, 2012 8:17 pm
"Should" is always more of a value judgment than a definite. Since we're dealing with the ruling of a court, which is legally binding, MUST (which is definite) is the proper choice.
Join Veritas Prep’s 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by rishijhawar » Thu Apr 19, 2012 10:27 pm
Hi Bill, thanks for your reply.

But I am not very clear on the distinction between value judgement and definite judgement. Would be great if you can quote some relevant examples. I believe googling will throw a lot of examples, but just want to stick to authentic source and site such as BTG. Tks
Join the discussion