BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

integers

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

integers

by fskilnik@GMATH » Tue Sep 04, 2018 1:17 pm
vaibhav101 wrote:Is the integer n odd?

1) n is divisible by 3.
2) 2n is divisible by twice as many integers as n.
All nonzero integers are divisors of zero, therefore statement (2) would not have sense.
(Cardinality - in particular dealing with "infinity sizes" - is out-of-GMAT´s scope.)

We will assume that n is positive without loss of generality.
(Reason: m is a factor of n if, and only if, m is a factor of the opposite of n.)

(1) Insufficient:

> If n = 3 , we have YES
> If n = 6 , we have NO

(2) Sufficient: this statement is equivalent to saying that n is odd, as we shall see below:

> If n = 1 , n has 2 factors (1, -1) and 2n=2 has 4 factors (1, -1, 2, -2) , hence n=1 satisfies (2) and is odd.
> If n is odd and greater than 1, n may be written as a product of odd primes, and we have:
\[n \geqslant 3\,\,\,{\text{odd}}\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\left\{ \begin{gathered}
n = {p_1}^{{k_{\,1}}} \cdot {p_2}^{{k_{\,2}}} \cdot \ldots \cdot {p_m}^{{k_{\,m}}}\,\,\,\,,\,\,\,3 \leqslant {p_1} < {p_2} < \ldots < {p_m}\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,2\left[ {\left( {{k_1} + 1} \right)\left( {{k_2} + 1} \right) \ldots \left( {{k_m} + 1} \right)} \right]\,\,{\text{factors}} \hfill \\
2n = 2 \cdot {p_1}^{{k_{\,1}}} \cdot {p_2}^{{k_{\,2}}} \cdot \ldots \cdot {p_m}^{{k_{\,m}}}\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,2\left[ {\left( {1 + 1} \right)\left[ {\left( {{k_1} + 1} \right)\left( {{k_2} + 1} \right) \ldots \left( {{k_m} + 1} \right)} \right]} \right] = 4\left[ {\left( {{k_1} + 1} \right)\left( {{k_2} + 1} \right) \ldots \left( {{k_m} + 1} \right)} \right]\,\,{\text{factors}} \hfill \\
\end{gathered} \right.\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\left( 2 \right)\,\,\,{\text{satisfied}}\]

> If n=2 , n has 4 factors (1,-1,2,-2) but 2n=4 has "only" 6 factors (1, -1, 2, -2, 4, -4) , hence n=2 does not satisfy (2).

> If n is even and greater than 2, we may write: n = (2^k)*M, where M is odd (we have put all 2´s together), hence:
\[n = {2^k} \cdot M\,,\,\,M\,\,{\text{odd}}\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,n\,\,{\text{has}}\,\,\,2\left[ {\left( {k + 1} \right) \cdot \left( {\# \,\,{\text{positive}}\,\,{\text{factors}}\,\,{\text{of}}\,\,M} \right)} \right]\,\,\,{\text{factors}}\]
\[2n = {2^{k + 1}} \cdot M\,,\,\,M\,\,{\text{odd}}\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,n\,\,{\text{has}}\,\,\,2\left[ {\left( {k + 1 + 1} \right) \cdot \left( {\# \,\,{\text{positive}}\,\,{\text{factors}}\,\,{\text{of}}\,\,M} \right)} \right]\,\,\,{\text{factors}}\]
Note that
\[2\left[ {\left( {k + 1 + 1} \right)} \right] \ne 2\left( {k + 1} \right)\]
guarantees that no positive even integer satisfies statement (2)... we are done.

Regards,
fskilnik.
Last edited by fskilnik@GMATH on Thu Sep 06, 2018 8:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion

by Jay@ManhattanReview » Tue Sep 04, 2018 10:06 pm
vaibhav101 wrote:is the integer n odd?

1) n is divisible by 3.
2) 2n is divisible by twice as many integers as n.
Let's take each statement one by one.

1) n is divisible by 3.

n can be odd (say 3) or even (say 6). Insufficient.

2) 2n is divisible by twice as many integers as n.

Case 1: Say n is odd; take n = 3, thus 2n = 6

Factors of n = 3: {1, 2, 3};
Factors of 2n = 6: {1, 2, 3, 6}. Number of factors of 2n (there are 4 factors) is double the number of factors of n (there are 2 factors)

Thus, n can be odd.

Let's see whether n can be even.

Case 2: Say n is even; take n = 2, thus 2n = 4

Factors of n = 2: {1, 2,};
Factors of 2n = 4: {1, 2, 4}. Number of factors of 2n (there are 3 factors) is NOT double the number of factors of n (there are 2 factors).

Thus, n cannot be even.

Thus, the answer is, yes. Sufficient.

The correct answer: B

Hope this helps!

-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review

Locations: Manhattan Review Visakhapatnam | GMAT Prep Warangal | GRE Prep Dilsukhnagar | Begumpet GRE Coaching | and many more...

Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.
Join the discussion