BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Integers

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by reachac » Thu Jul 24, 2008 10:05 am
Yups me too got A
Join the discussion

by Sunny22uk » Thu Jul 24, 2008 10:09 am
Is this question from McGraw hill? I have seen a lot of errors in their practice tests. The answer should be A.
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to loose sight of the shore.
Join the discussion

by wilderness » Thu Jul 24, 2008 11:14 am
Yes it is.

Do you know if the difficulty level of McGraw Hill is closed to the real exam. I find them much easier than Power Prep and Kaplan. What was your expeirence about the relative difficulty.
Join the discussion

by Sunny22uk » Thu Jul 24, 2008 11:19 am
I think 95% of the questions are of difficulty 400-500 and the scoring of these tests is based on percentage of questions you do right.I am doing these tests to develop stamina for just sitting in the exam for 4 hours.
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to loose sight of the shore.
Join the discussion

by ricky » Thu Jul 24, 2008 11:35 am
YES it DOES in both equations...So D :lol:
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Jul 24, 2008 11:40 am
From (2), either q OR n must equal 0, so we can't answer the original question. The answer should be (A).
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by malolakrupa » Thu Jul 24, 2008 1:14 pm
I agree with D , because to test the values of both the equation when you substitue n = 0 , both the equations are valid . Hence the answer D.
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Jul 24, 2008 1:40 pm
malolakrupa wrote:I agree with D , because to test the values of both the equation when you substitue n = 0 , both the equations are valid . Hence the answer D.
(D) is correct only if EACH statement by ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question.

If we look at statement (2) alone, we get:

q((2-n) - (2+n)) = 0

q(2 - n - 2 - n) = 0

q(-2n) = 0

-2qn = 0

qn = 0

So, we can conclude that EITHER q OR n must be 0, but we have no way of knowing which one it is.

Therefore, statement (2) is NOT sufficient on its own and we should choose:

(A) statement 1 is sufficient on its own but statement (2) is insufficient on its own.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion