BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Integer Properties.

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic (GMAT Focus Edition)
Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 80
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 10:08 pmFollowed by: 2 members
by kamalakarthi » Wed Aug 02, 2017 3:16 am
GMAT Gurus,

In this DS question, I came to conclusion that Statement 1 is not sufficient. But, it turns out to be wrong. Can you please help on what am I missing in the big picture.

My work: Since ab = 2, either both a and b are + ve or -ve

in case of +ve, It could be 2 and 1 or 4 and 1/2 if it is 2 and 1 then [a] + = 1 as a would be 1 and b would be 0 but this is not true if a was 4 and b was 1/2. Same for -ve as well. So, I thought statement A is not sufficient.

Statement 2, I was able to conclude 2 is not sufficient.
Attachments
Q5.jpg
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2095
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pmFollowed by: 247 members
Thanked: 1443 times

by ceilidh.erickson » Wed Aug 02, 2017 10:11 am
Be careful - you are slightly misinterpreting the prompt: [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x. For any non-integer, we round down to the nearest integer. But whenever x is an integer, then [x] = x.

Use the same testing cases approach you were using before:

(1) ab = 2

Case 1:
a = 2 --> [a] = 2
b = 1 --> = 1
[a] + = 2 + 1 = 3

We get a "no" answer to the question. So can we get a "yes" answer to the question?

Your initial analysis was sound: a product of 2 tells us that we have (positive*positive) or (negative*negative). If both a and b are negative, then [a] and must also be negative, so their sum can never equal 1.

If both positive, then either both a and b equal the square root of 2, or one is greater and the other is smaller than the square root of 2.

Case 2:
a = sqrt(2) = approx. 1.4 --> [a] = 1
b = sqrt(2) --> = 1
[a] + = 2

Again, a "no" answer to the question. Since this is the closest together that we can get the two values, it is the minimum possible value of [a] + . Therefore, there is no possible way that [a] + = 1. We have sufficient information to know that the answer is definitively "no."

Does that help?
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2095
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pmFollowed by: 247 members
Thanked: 1443 times

by ceilidh.erickson » Wed Aug 02, 2017 10:12 am
Please also post the source of this question. It's a copyright violation not to do so!
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2095
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pmFollowed by: 247 members
Thanked: 1443 times

by ceilidh.erickson » Wed Aug 02, 2017 10:14 am
This formula structure of "greatest integer less than or equal to" or "least integer greater than or equal to" is very common on the GMAT. Here are some other examples to practice with:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ds-t276593.html#719492
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ds-t281646.html#738122
https://www.beatthegmat.com/if-denotes-t ... tml#787526
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pmFollowed by: 1268 members
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Wed Aug 02, 2017 10:26 am
One more to practice with: https://www.beatthegmat.com/number-prope ... 71768.html

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 80
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 10:08 pmFollowed by: 2 members

by kamalakarthi » Wed Aug 02, 2017 10:43 am
Experts, Thanks for the reply. The source of this question is from gmatclub.com quant tests.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pmFollowed by: 1268 members
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Wed Aug 02, 2017 11:19 am
kamalakarthi wrote:The source of this question is from gmatclub.com quant tests.
Too late. The police are already on their way :-)
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2095
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pmFollowed by: 247 members
Thanked: 1443 times

by ceilidh.erickson » Wed Aug 02, 2017 11:34 am
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
kamalakarthi wrote:The source of this question is from gmatclub.com quant tests.
Too late. The police are already on their way :-)
:D
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2630
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pmFollowed by: 119 members
Location: East Bay all the way
Thanked: 625 times
GMAT Score:780

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Sun Aug 06, 2017 9:52 pm
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
kamalakarthi wrote:The source of this question is from gmatclub.com quant tests.
Too late. The police are already on their way :-)
But they didn't read him his copyrights, so he's off the hook :D
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2630
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pmFollowed by: 119 members
Location: East Bay all the way
Thanked: 625 times
GMAT Score:780

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Sun Aug 06, 2017 9:57 pm
kamalakarthi wrote: in case of +ve, It could be 2 and 1 or 4 and 1/2 if it is 2 and 1 then [a] + = 1 as a would be 1 and b would be 0 but this is not true if a was 4 and b was 1/2. Same for -ve as well. So, I thought statement A is not sufficient.


Let's assume that both a and b are positive. (If they're both negative, then obviously their floors can't sum to 1.)

If a > 0, b > 0, and ab = 2, then AT LEAST ONE of a and b must be ≥ √2. (If they're both < √2, then their product is less than √2 * √2.) If one of them is > √2, then the other must be < √2, or else their product will be > 2.

But whichever one is ≥ √2 must be at least [√2], or at least 1! Let's say that one is a. Then we've got 1 + , where b = 2/a. The only way that = 0 is if [2/a] = 0, or if 0 < 2/a < 1. But multiplying that inequality by a, we get 0 < 2 < a, or 2 < a, which can't be, since we can't have both terms be greater than √2.

So we can't get a sum of 1, no matter what.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2630
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pmFollowed by: 119 members
Location: East Bay all the way
Thanked: 625 times
GMAT Score:780

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Sun Aug 06, 2017 10:04 pm
Another way we could get there:

ab = 2

a = 2/b

With that, we have [a] + => [2/b] + .

We also know that a and b must be nonnegative integers. (If one of them is negative, then the other must be negative, since a = 2/b, and if they're both negative, then [a] and are both < 0.)

Now let's suppose that [2/b] + = 1. Since both [2/b] and are nonnegative integers, the only way we can get a sum of 1 is if one of these = 1 and the other = 0.

Let's take the first case, = 1 and [2/b] = 0. If that's the case, then 1 ≤ b < 2 and 0 < 2/b < 1. That second inequality simplifies as 2 < b. With that in mind, we must have b > 2 ... but if b > 2, then ≥ 2, and we saw above that = 1. That's a contradiction, so = 1 and [2/b] = 0 is impossible.

The second case ( = 0 and [2/b] = 1) works much the same way.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2630
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pmFollowed by: 119 members
Location: East Bay all the way
Thanked: 625 times
GMAT Score:780

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Sun Aug 06, 2017 10:09 pm
One last way to get there (and to get a feel for what's happening) is trying numbers.

A simple case if a = √2 and b = √2. That gives us [a] = 1 and = 1 and [a] + = 2. OK, too big, but let's try monkeying around with the numbers. For simplicity's sake, we'll make a > b.

If a ≥ 1.5, then [a] = 2, and [a] + > 1, so we can't have that either. With that in mind, we MUST have 1.5 > a ≥ √2, so a is in a pretty tight band between about 1.415 and 1.5. But if a's in that range, then b is somewhere between √2 and 2/1.5, or somewhere between 1.333... and about 1.415. With that in mind, our ranges are

1.5 > a ≥ √2, or [a] = 1

√2 ≥ b > 1.333..., or = 1

So by trying to keep a in the right range, we can't get any smaller than [a] + = 1 + 1.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pmFollowed by: 1268 members
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Aug 07, 2017 6:19 am
Matt@VeritasPrep wrote:
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
kamalakarthi wrote:The source of this question is from gmatclub.com quant tests.
Too late. The police are already on their way :-)
But they didn't read him his copyrights, so he's off the hook :D
Perhaps, but you're not off the hook for that pun!!!
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2630
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pmFollowed by: 119 members
Location: East Bay all the way
Thanked: 625 times
GMAT Score:780

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Fri Aug 18, 2017 1:20 pm
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
Matt@VeritasPrep wrote:
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
kamalakarthi wrote:The source of this question is from gmatclub.com quant tests.
Too late. The police are already on their way :-)
But they didn't read him his copyrights, so he's off the hook :D
Perhaps, but you're not off the hook for that pun!!!
Brent, you are no pun at all :p
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pmFollowed by: 1268 members
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Aug 19, 2017 5:18 am
Matt@VeritasPrep wrote:
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
Matt@VeritasPrep wrote:
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
kamalakarthi wrote:The source of this question is from gmatclub.com quant tests.
Too late. The police are already on their way :-)
But they didn't read him his copyrights, so he's off the hook :D
Perhaps, but you're not off the hook for that pun!!!
Brent, you are no pun at all :p
I happun to believe I'm very pun :-)
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1