BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

If [x] denotes the

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by [email protected] » Sat Dec 31, 2016 10:08 am
Hi fiza gupta,

This DS question can be solved by TESTing VALUES.

We're told that [X] = the largest integer that is SMALLER than X. We're asked if [X] > [-X]. This is a YES/NO question.

1) X = [X] + 1

IF....
X = 1
[1] = 0 and 1 = 0+1
[-1] = -2 and the answer to the question is YES.

IF....
X = 0
[0] = -1 and 0 = -1+1
[-0] = -1 and the answer to the question is NO.
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT

2) X + 1 > 0

Both of the TESTs that I used in Fact 1 also 'fit' the information in Fact 2....

IF....
X = 1
[1] = 0 and 1 = 0+1
[-1] = -2 and the answer to the question is YES.

IF....
X = 0
[0] = -1 and 0 = -1+1
[-0] = -1 and the answer to the question is NO.
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Combined, we already have two TESTs that fit both Facts - and we have two different answers to the given question.
Combined, INSUFFICIENT

Final Answer: E

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Dec 31, 2016 5:28 pm
Here are two similar questions to practice with:
- https://www.beatthegmat.com/ds-t276593.html
- https://www.beatthegmat.com/number-prope ... 71768.html

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by fiza gupta » Sun Jan 01, 2017 6:27 am
Thanks Experts! :)
Fiza Gupta
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Mon Jan 02, 2017 6:14 pm
fiza gupta wrote:If [x] denotes the largest integer smaller than x, is [x] > [−x]?

(1) x = [x] + 1
(2) x + 1 > 0

OA:E
Before testing values, it's often helpful to translate the question into words. When the GMAT says "[x] denotes the largest integer smaller than x," what they really mean is "round down (to the left on the number line) to the nearest integer."

So when would [x] > [−x]? When would the rounded-down-integer from x be greater than the rounded-down-integer from -x? When x is positive, and -x is negative. (If x = 0, then both x and -x would round down to -1).
Target question: is x > 0?

(1) x = [x] + 1
If x is 1 greater than the rounded-down-integer from x, this simply tells us that x is any integer. For example,
if x = 3, [x] = 2
if x = -5, [x] = -6
This is insufficient to answer our target question.

(2) x + 1 > 0
Rearrange:
x > -1
Since our target question is "is x positive?", this is insufficient. If x = -0.5, we'd get a "no" answer to our question, but if x = 2, we'd get a "yes" answer.

1 & 2 combined
With the two statements together, we know that x is an integer greater than -1. This might seem at first to answer our question, but remember to consider 0:
if x = 0, [x] = -1 and [-x] = -1. So the answer to our question is "no."
if x = 4, [x] = 3 and [-x] = -5, so the answer is "yes."

Insufficient. The answer is E.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Mon Jan 02, 2017 6:17 pm
And since the GMAT really loves this construction, here's another one to add to Brent's list:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ds-t281646.html#738122
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion