BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Instructors plz help...Inqeuality DS 32

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: Inqeuality DS 32

by ankur_swayam » Sat Oct 03, 2009 8:15 am
ern5231 wrote:32) Is (a^2) b + a (b^2) > 0 ?

(1) a <0

(2) a+b<0
The answer is E
Join the discussion

by ern5231 » Sat Oct 03, 2009 8:50 am
How did you arrive at E? I feel the answer is B
Join the discussion

by glorydefined » Sat Oct 03, 2009 10:01 am
I too think it is B
Join the discussion

by ern5231 » Sat Oct 03, 2009 9:13 pm
Can anyone explain how is it B?
Join the discussion

by sanjana » Sat Oct 03, 2009 10:23 pm
IMO : E

Question :
is (a^2)b + a(b^2) > 0
==>is ab(a+b) > 0

for this to be true we have 2 cases :

1)ab>0 and (a+b) >0
2)ab<0 and (a+b) <0

Statement 1
Tells us a<0 but gives no information on b,hence insufficient

statement 2
Tells us (a+b) < 0 ,
This tells us nothig about a and b individually so we cant say if ab >0 or ab < 0,hence insufficient
Pick numbers to verify :
a=-1,b=-5 ==> -1-5 <0
a=-7,b=2 ==> =7+2 <0

Together again,

We know a<0 and we know a+b <0 but we dont know the sign of b and hence both statements togetjer are also insufficient.
Join the discussion

by ern5231 » Sun Oct 04, 2009 5:36 am
Is (a^2) b + a (b^2) > 0 ?

(1) a <0

(2) a+b<0

Can we follow this approach -

(a^2)b>-a(b^2)
Hence, Is a>-b?

(1) does not make it suff
(2) a<-b looks suff

Hence B. Am I going wrong anywhere?
Join the discussion

by umaa » Sun Oct 04, 2009 6:57 am
ern5231 wrote:Is (a^2) b + a (b^2) > 0 ?

(1) a <0

(2) a+b<0

Can we follow this approach -

(a^2)b>-a(b^2)
Hence, Is a>-b?

(1) does not make it suff
(2) a<-b looks suff

Hence B. Am I going wrong anywhere?
IMO E.

We can write (a^2) b + a (b^2) > 0 as ab(a+b) > 0.

a+b<0. it means,

a b
- -
- +
+ -

There are three possibilities.

If one is negative and the other is positive, the answer might be negative.

But if both are negative, the answer will be positive.

Since we're getting 2 kind of answers B is not sufficient.

Even if you take both the statements, you will get 2 answers. So, both the statements together are not sufficient.
What we think, we become
Join the discussion

by ern5231 » Thu Oct 08, 2009 8:11 pm
Thanks Sanjana and Umaa. Your explanations look good but can you point out the mistake with my approach?
Join the discussion

by crackgmat007 » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:15 pm
ern5231 wrote:Thanks Sanjana and Umaa. Your explanations look good but can you point out the mistake with my approach?
In the rephrase. Since you dont know whether a or be is negative or positive, you need to consider different possibilities.

IMO Rephrase is ab(a+b)>0

1. We dont the the sign of b
2. Given (a+b)<0. We dont know the sign of ab

1&2

From stmt 1, we know a<0. But we still dont know sign of b. Hence E.
Join the discussion