BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inflation rising trend

Expert replies
by Gaurav 2013-fall » Sat May 19, 2012 12:17 am
Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the current year it has been 4 percent. We can
conclude that inflation is on an upward trend and the rate will be still higher next year.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion above?
(A) The inflation figures were computed on the basis of a representative sample of economic data rather than
all of the available data.
(B) Last year a dip in oil prices brought inflation temporarily below its recent stable annual level of 4 percent.
(C) Increases in the pay of some workers are tied to the level of inflation, and at an inflation rate of 4 percent
or above, these pay raises constitute a force causing further inflation.
(D) The 1.2 percent rate of inflation last year represented a ten-year low.
(E) Government intervention cannot affect the rate of inflation to any significant degree.

[spoiler]
OA B : source OG 10
[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by GmatKiss » Sat May 19, 2012 12:37 am
Gaurav 2013-fall wrote:Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the current year it has been 4 percent. We can
conclude that inflation is on an upward trend and the rate will be still higher next year.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion above?

We need to check for options which will tell us inflation may not increase continuously!

(A) The inflation figures were computed on the basis of a representative sample of economic data rather than all of the available data. - Nope; It says the calculations are wrong (Out of scope)
(B) Last year a dip in oil prices brought inflation temporarily below its recent stable annual level of 4 percent. Perfect; Says the inflation has stabled at 4
(C) Increases in the pay of some workers are tied to the level of inflation, and at an inflation rate of 4 percent or above, these pay raises constitute a force causing further inflation. So what ?? Irrelevant
(D) The 1.2 percent rate of inflation last year represented a ten-year low. Out of scope
(E) Government intervention cannot affect the rate of inflation to any significant degree. Out of Scope

IMO: B
Join the discussion

by ice_rush » Sat May 19, 2012 10:56 am
(B) is the clear winner here.

fyi..Choice (C) actually strengthens the argument.
Join the discussion

by sachindia » Thu Sep 13, 2012 5:53 am
I dont understand why A is wrong.

If it was calculated using a representation and not the actual data, then the derivation about the inflation result is wrong. So we cannot say that inflation will increase or decrease as the previous data was wrong.

Experts please help
Regards,
Sach
Join the discussion

by everything's eventual » Thu Sep 13, 2012 9:38 am
A) - How can you assume that the representative sample does not have the correct figures? This sample could still have the correct or close to correct figure.
Join the discussion

by vk_vinayak » Thu Sep 13, 2012 11:35 am
sachindia wrote:I dont understand why A is wrong.

If it was calculated using a representation and not the actual data, then the derivation about the inflation result is wrong. So we cannot say that inflation will increase or decrease as the previous data was wrong.

Experts please help
If the inflation is calculated wrongly the actual current inflation could be more than 4 also. It confirms that inflation is increasing. At the same time it could be less than 1.6, which says that inflation is decreasing. This option affects both cases (Strengthen and Weaken) equally. Hence it (Option A) is not correct.
- VK

I will (Learn. Recognize. Apply)
Join the discussion