BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inference : Need valid justification for correct answer

Expert replies
by gauravgundal » Sat Oct 01, 2011 12:00 pm
Source : Princeton Practice question book

Greg: the dramatic rise in illegal immigration in the last decade is evidenced by the fact that 7 of every 10 small business owners reports knowingly employing ,or knowing a small business owner who knowingly employs, an illegal immigrant.

Jackson: But the statistics show that 10 years ago, approximately 8% of small businesses employed an illegal immigrant, with 1 in 12 doing so. So if the average small business owner knew 20 other small business owners, it is unlikely that they would not have known ne who employs an illegal immigrant.

Jackson's argument is designed to support which of the following conclusions?

A.If more than 8% of small businesses employ an illegal immigrant, the 7 of 10 figure greg cites must be too high.
B.The current percentage of small businesses employing an illegal immigrant must be greater than it was a decade ago
C.If statistics show that 8% of small businesses employed an illegal immigrant, the actual percentage is likely much higher.
D.That 7 of 10 small business owners know someone who employs an illegal immigrant does not demonstrate that illegal immigration has increased in the last 10 years.
E.It is likely that the owners Greg cities would have openly acknowledged breaking the law

[spoiler]OA: D ;IMO: D[/spoiler]

Even though I nailed down to the correct answer,I am hardly able to explain myself how D is the correct answer.
can you please provide me valid justification for correct answer ?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Oct 01, 2011 3:06 pm
gauravgundal wrote:Source : Princeton Practice question book

Greg: the dramatic rise in illegal immigration in the last decade is evidenced by the fact that 7 of every 10 small business owners reports knowingly employing ,or knowing a small business owner who knowingly employs, an illegal immigrant.

Jackson: But the statistics show that 10 years ago, approximately 8% of small businesses employed an illegal immigrant, with 1 in 12 doing so. So if the average small business owner knew 20 other small business owners, it is unlikely that they would not have known ne who employs an illegal immigrant.

Jackson's argument is designed to support which of the following conclusions?

A.If more than 8% of small businesses employ an illegal immigrant, the 7 of 10 figure greg cites must be too high.
B.The current percentage of small businesses employing an illegal immigrant must be greater than it was a decade ago
C.If statistics show that 8% of small businesses employed an illegal immigrant, the actual percentage is likely much higher.
D.That 7 of 10 small business owners know someone who employs an illegal immigrant does not demonstrate that illegal immigration has increased in the last 10 years.
E.It is likely that the owners Greg cities would have openly acknowledged breaking the law

[spoiler]OA: D ;IMO: D[/spoiler]

Even though I nailed down to the correct answer,I am hardly able to explain myself how D is the correct answer.
can you please provide me valid justification for correct answer ?
When a CR features two speakers, the two speakers almost invariably will come to OPPOSITE CONCLUSIONS.
Otherwise, the second speaker would serve no purpose.

Greg's conclusion: That ONE statistic -- 7 of every 10 small business owners reports knowingly employing, or knowing a small business owner who knowingly employs, an illegal immigrant -- is evidence of the rise in illegal immigration.

Jackson comes to the OPPOSITE CONCLUSION: That the statistic offered by Greg is NOT evidence of the rise in illegal immigration. (Jackson offers statistics of his own to support his position.)

Answer choice D describes Jackson's conclusion: That 7 of 10 small business owners know someone who employs an illegal immigrant -- the ONE statistic offered by Greg -- does NOT demonstrate that illegal immigration has increased in the last 10 years.

The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by 1947 » Sat Oct 01, 2011 10:01 pm
Nice explanation Mitch...Thanks
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button. Thanks
Join the discussion

by sl750 » Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:34 am
This argument is similar to an OG argument about prisoners. Only, there the answer choice was more trickier to identify
Join the discussion