BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inequality Tough question

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by mevicks » Wed Oct 02, 2013 7:26 pm
rakeshd347 wrote:If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1?

(1) x/|x|< x

(2) |x| > x

Simplify:

x ≠ 0

Is |x| < 1
or
Is -1 < x < 1 ? ... (i)

Solve:

St1:

Verify using very simple numbers:
x = -0.5
-0.5 / 0.5 < -0.5
-1 < -0.5 (i) is true

x = 2
2 / 2 < 2
1 < 2 (i) is false
INSUFFICIENT.

St2:
|x| > x
in other words x = -ive (This means x is always less than |+ive|, one can verify that only -ive values of x will satisfy this equation)
INSUFFICIENT.

St1 + St2:

We know that x is -ive we just need to check other smaller negative values by plugging numbers in the St1. This would narrow down the range if possible.

x = -1
-1 / 1 < -1
-1 < -1 (Invalid)

x = -0.5 (i) is always true as proved in St1.

x = -2
-2 / 2 < -2
-1 < -2 (Invalid)

Thus -1 < x < 0
We can definitely answer (i)

[spoiler]Answer : C[/spoiler]

Regards,
Vivek
Join the discussion

by theCodeToGMAT » Wed Oct 02, 2013 9:04 pm
To find if |X| < 1

Statement 1:
x/|X| < x

if "x" is positive .. then |X| > 1

if "x" is negative .. then |X| < 1
INSUFFICIENT

Statement 2:
|x| > x
This implies x is surely negative
INSUFFICIENT

Combining..

|X| < 1
SUFFICIENT


Answer [spoiler]{C}[/spoiler]
R A H U L
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Oct 03, 2013 3:18 am
If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1?

(1) x/|x|< x

(2) |x| > x
Question rephrased: Is x between -1 and 1?

Statement 1: x/|x| < x
x < x|x|

0 < x|x| - x

0 < x (|x| - 1)

The CRITICAL POINTS are -1, 0 and 1.
These are the only values where x(|x|-1) = 0.
To determine the ranges where x(|x|-1) > 0, test one value to the left and right of each critical point.

Case 1: x<-1
Plug x = -2 into x/|x| < x:
-2/ |-2| < -2
-1 < -2.
Doesn't work.
Thus, x < -1 is not a valid range.

Case 2: -1<x<0
Plug x = -1/2 into x/|x| < x:
-1/2/ |-1/2| < -1/2
-1 < -1/2.
This works.
Thus, -1<x<0 is a valid range.

Case 3: 0<x<1
Plug x = 1/2 into x/|x| < x:
(1/2)/ |1/2| < 1/2
1 < 1/2
Doesn't work.
Thus, 0<x<1 is not a valid range.

Case 4: x>1
Plug x = 2 into x/|x| < x:
2/ |2| < 2
1 < 2.
This works.
Thus, x > 1 is a valid range.

Thus, -1<x<0 or x>1.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: |x| > x
Any negative value will satisfy this inequality.
If x=-1/2, then x is between -1 and 1.
If x=-2, then x is NOT between -1 and 1.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statements combined:
The only range that satisfies both statements is -1<x<0.
Thus, x is between -1 and 1.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:37 pm
We can solve this algebraically, but we can also think about it CONCEPTUALLY.

Question: is |x| < 1?
For what kinds of number would this be true? Absolute value is always positive, so what numbers have an absolute value of between 0 and 1? Positive or negative fractions.

Rephrased question: is x between -1 and 1? (not including 0)

Statement 1: x/|x|< x
Instead of rearranging this algebraically, we could use a number line to ask ourselves - for what kinds of numbers will this be true?

Image

We can see that this will be true for negative fractions or positive numbers greater than 1.
Translation: -1 < x < 0 or x > 1
Does this answer our question? Well, a negative fraction would give us a "yes" answer, but a number greater than 1 would give us a "no" answer to the question. Insufficient.

Statement 2: |x| > x
For what kinds of numbers will the absolute value be less than the number itself? Positive numbers are always equal to their absolute value, but negative numbers have a positive absolute value, so they're less than their absolute value.
Translation: x is negative
Does this answer our question? No. Insufficient.

Statements 1 & 2: -1 < x < 0 or x > 1 AND x is negative
Translation: x is a negative fraction

Sufficient.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:40 pm
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion