BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inequality

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Anurag@Gurome » Fri Jan 28, 2011 12:03 am
GHong14 wrote:x^y < y^x is x < y?

x = y²

Sufficient or not?
Take, y = 3 => x = 9 ----> x > y
Take, y = 0.5 => x = 0.25 ----> x < y

NOT sufficient.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by cyrwr1 » Fri Jan 28, 2011 10:22 am
Can you clarify the question ? thanks
Join the discussion

by roshnipat1610 » Mon Feb 07, 2011 1:07 am
Dont' we have to take into account this condition that x^y < y^x?

Continuing with Anurag's numbers:

If y = 3 , x = 9

(9) ^ 3 < (3) ^ 9

True

If y = 1/2 x = 1/4

(1/4)^ (1/2) < (1/2) ^(1/4)

1/2 < (1/2)^(1/4)

True

Hence this condition is insuff.
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Mon Feb 07, 2011 5:49 am
GHong14 wrote:x^y < y^x is x < y?

x=y^2

Sufficient or not?
statement: x=y^2 --> Sqrt(x)=|y|. Condition for y>0 i) when y is even, x >y; ii) when y is odd, x<y. We are let to decide with more than one statement, hence Not Sufficient.
Join the discussion

by shashank03 » Thu Feb 10, 2011 2:35 am
y^2y<y^x
1<y^(x-2y)
so
x-2y>0
and hence x>2y
which means the condition is sufficient
Join the discussion

by earnest10 » Fri Feb 11, 2011 7:18 am
GHong14 wrote:x^y < y^x is x < y?

x=y^2

Sufficient or not?
since x = y^2

x ^y < y^x will be :

y^(2y) < y ^(y^2)

so , 2y = y^2 ; 2 < y

since y > 2 ... it confirms that y is +ve and greater than 2.

so it is sufficient.
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Fri Feb 11, 2011 8:49 am
statement: x=y^2 --> Sqrt(x)=|y|.
x=9, y={-3;3} --> x^y < y^x= 9^3 < 3^9 BUT 9^-3 > -3^9, hence not Sufficient
earnest10 wrote:
GHong14 wrote:x^y < y^x is x < y?

x=y^2

Sufficient or not?
since x = y^2

x ^y < y^x will be :

y^(2y) < y ^(y^2)

so , 2y = [<] y^2; //2y<y^2 --> sqrt(2y)< |y|, it's not correct to say that 2<y, because |y| = {-ve;+ve}, for example y=|3| while 2*3<3*3, 2*(-3)>(-3)*(-3); so it is not always possible for 2 < y// 2 < y

since y > 2 ... it confirms that y is +ve and greater than 2.

so it is sufficient.
Join the discussion