Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

inequality

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by yalanand » Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:24 pm
I feel answer is E


1) Suppose x=1.9 then still the given equation is greater than 0..and x< 3

2) Not sufficient as explained above..

Combining both of them Not sufficient.
Join the discussion

by welcome » Tue Jan 13, 2009 3:32 pm
To prove X >3.

1) (X-3) (X-2) (X-1) >0

To make this hapenne..
1. X should not equal to 3 or 2 or 1.
2. either all of then are +ve or at least 2 of them are -ve.

But cant say whether X>3 or not, because for X=4 this relation is true, but it is also tru for X=1.7. so NOT SUFF

2) X>1, simpally X=2 is false but x=4 is true for the statement given. so NOT SUFF


but combining both will say this,
X>1 and X is not 1,2,3 it means x>3.

Ans : C
Shubham.
590 >> 630 >> 640 >> 610 >> 600 >> 640 >> 590 >> 640 >> 590 >> 590
Join the discussion

Re: inequality

by logitech » Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:31 pm
Is x-3 > 0

1. (x-3) (x-2) (x-1) > 0

- - +
+ + +

are the only two ways we can have a positive product

we don't know which so INSUF

2. x>1[/quote]

Hmm

x-1> 0 means

x>1 so we still can not find out whether x>3 ( on another note, if this option was x>4 , we would choose B )

1+2 together


- - +
+ + +

so we have one POSITIVE for sure so we are left with

- - or + +

we now that x >1 but if it is less than 2

we will have

- -

if x is greater than 3 we will have

+ +

Do we know anything about where x lies ? NO

E
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by logitech » Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:33 pm
welcome wrote:To prove X >3.

1) (X-3) (X-2) (X-1) >0

To make this hapenne..
1. X should not equal to 3 or 2 or 1.
2. either all of then are +ve or at least 2 of them are -ve.

But cant say whether X>3 or not, because for X=4 this relation is true, but it is also tru for X=1.7. so NOT SUFF

2) X>1, simpally X=2 is false but x=4 is true for the statement given. so NOT SUFF


but combining both will say this,
X>1 and X is not 1,2,3 it means x>3.

Ans : C
This is a very nice solution but we are NOT told that X can be only integer.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by welcome » Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:36 pm
logitech,
Where is this mentioned that X should be an integer. Or it is some kind of rule or assumption. Please tell me the details.

Thanks in advance.
Shubham.
590 >> 630 >> 640 >> 610 >> 600 >> 640 >> 590 >> 640 >> 590 >> 590
Join the discussion

by logitech » Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:40 pm
welcome wrote:logitech,
Where is this mentioned that X should be an integer. Or it is some kind of rule or assumption. Please tell me the details.

Thanks in advance.
Well nothing is mentioned about X so it can be any number. Fraction or integer.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion