Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Inequality Madness

Expert replies
by heshamelaziry » Thu Oct 15, 2009 8:38 pm
Is x > y ?

(1) -4x + 2y < y - 3x

(2) wx > wy


In statement 2, why can't I divide each side by w and get x > y ??????????????
Last edited by heshamelaziry on Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by sanjana » Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:35 pm
Statement 1
-----------

2y-y < -3x+4x
y<x - sufficient.

Statement 2
------------

wx-wy > 0
w(x-y) > 0

Now either W>0 and X-Y > 0 ==> X>Y
or W<0 and X-Y < 0 ==> X<Y

Hence the answer could be yes or no.
Insufficient.

IMO : A

Whats the OA?
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:05 pm
sanjana wrote:Statement 1
-----------

2y-y < -3x+4x
y<x - sufficient.

Statement 2
------------

wx-wy > 0
w(x-y) > 0

Now either W>0 and X-Y > 0 ==> X>Y
or W<0 and X-Y < 0 ==> X<Y

Hence the answer could be yes or no.
Insufficient.

IMO : A

Whats the OA?[/quot


In statement 2, why can't I divide each side by w and get x > y ??????????????

OA is A. how you figure to do it this way rather than what I am describing above that is correct too !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Join the discussion

by regor60 » Fri Oct 16, 2009 5:52 am
Simple reason can't divide by w. Assume w=-3 and x=-2, y=1 so

wx>wy = (-3)*(-2)> (-3)*(1) TRUE

divide by w

x>y = -2>1 FALSE
Join the discussion

by aakar » Fri Oct 16, 2009 5:59 am
Just make a note to remember that in inequalities you can't multiple or divide by a variable, because the variable could be negative and could potentially flip the greater/less then sign.
Join the discussion

by sanjana » Fri Oct 16, 2009 7:25 am
In Inequalities you should never divide by a number unless you know the sign of the number.

Also Suppose you have a normal equation
say,
X^2-X = 0

if you divide by x you get,
x-1=0,hence x=1
By doing this you have missed one solution of the equation completely,i.e x=0
You should always do,
x(x-1)=0
hence,x=0 or x=1.

Hope this helps!
Join the discussion