BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inequality and absolute values

Expert replies
by papgust » Sun Feb 28, 2010 6:30 am
If xy ≠ 0, is x > y?

(1) 4x = 3y
(2) |y - x| = x - y

OA: D
Source: Magoosh.com


For these kinds of problems, I've always found plugging in method quite tedious although it's solvable by plugging in. Any easy approach to this problem.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by ajith » Sun Feb 28, 2010 6:49 am
papgust wrote:If xy ≠ 0, is x > y?

(1) 4x = 3y
(2) |y - x| = x - y

OA: D
Source: Magoosh.com


For these kinds of problems, I've always found plugging in method quite tedious although it's solvable by plugging in. Any easy approach to this problem.
1) 4x = 3y

True for both of these sets of x and y
x= -3 y =-4 ; x>y
x=3 y =4 ; x<y

Insufficient

2) |y - x| = x - y

y-x is -ve or zero

y-x <=0

x>= y

Insufficient (x can be equal to y)

Combining

sufficient to conclude that x>y

C, Please check OA
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion

by papgust » Sun Feb 28, 2010 11:17 pm
I'm sorry. It's a typo.

OA is C
Join the discussion

by girish3131 » Mon Mar 08, 2010 5:35 am
@Ajith

i didn't get this point when u say

|y - x| = x - y

y-x is -ve or zero


acc to me eq 2 is sufficient.... ans is B

b'coz

y-x = x-y i.e. x=y

or

y-x = -(x-y) i.e. y-x = y-x # wat to conclude from this point , am not 100% sure...

still i prefer B , on the basis of above info...

Plz correct me if wrong...

TA...
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:05 pm
girish3131 wrote:@Ajith

i didn't get this point when u say

|y - x| = x - y

y-x is -ve or zero


acc to me eq 2 is sufficient.... ans is B

b'coz

y-x = x-y i.e. x=y

or

y-x = -(x-y) i.e. y-x = y-x # wat to conclude from this point , am not 100% sure...

still i prefer B , on the basis of above info...

Plz correct me if wrong...

TA...
Let's look at the second statement:

|y - x| = x - y

Absolute value is always positive or zero. Therefore, the left hand side must be positive or zero. The two sides of the equation must be equal. Therefore, the right hand side also must be positive or zero:

x - y >= 0

x >= y

So, as Ajith points out, either x is bigger than y, or else x is equal to y. Because we don't know for sure whether x is bigger than y, this statement is insufficient by itself.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion